SOC
Price
$27.55
Change
-$2.23 (-7.49%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
2.74B
88 days until earnings call
YZCFF
Price
$0.07
Change
+$0.01 (+16.67%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
4.4B
Interact to see
Advertisement

SOC vs YZCFF

Header iconSOC vs YZCFF Comparison
Open Charts SOC vs YZCFFBanner chart's image
Sable Offshore
Price$27.55
Change-$2.23 (-7.49%)
Volume$2.19M
Capitalization2.74B
Sinopec Yizheng Chem Fibre
Price$0.07
Change+$0.01 (+16.67%)
Volume$200
Capitalization4.4B
SOC vs YZCFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SOC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SOC vs. YZCFF commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SOC is a Hold and YZCFF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (SOC: $27.55 vs. YZCFF: $0.07)
Brand notoriety: SOC and YZCFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Contract Drilling industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SOC: 87% vs. YZCFF: 100%
Market capitalization -- SOC: $2.74B vs. YZCFF: $4.4B
SOC [@Contract Drilling] is valued at $2.74B. YZCFF’s [@Contract Drilling] market capitalization is $4.4B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Contract Drilling] industry ranges from $4.4B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Contract Drilling] industry is $1.24B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SOC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileYZCFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SOC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • YZCFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both SOC and YZCFF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SOC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SOC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

SOC (@Contract Drilling) experienced а -4.44% price change this week, while YZCFF (@Contract Drilling) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Contract Drilling industry was -0.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.70%.

Reported Earning Dates

SOC is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Contract Drilling (-0.73% weekly)

The contract drilling industry includes companies that provide onshore and offshore drilling services to the energy sector. Services are delivered on a contractual or per-fee basis. Customers of this industry include major and independent oil and gas companies. Strong oil demand could potentially boost contract fees. Helmerich & Payne, Inc., Transocean Ltd and Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. are among the major drilling companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
YZCFF($4.4B) has a higher market cap than SOC($2.74B). SOC YTD gains are higher at: 20.306 vs. YZCFF (0.000). YZCFF has more cash in the bank: 4.87B vs. SOC (189M). SOC has less debt than YZCFF: SOC (873M) vs YZCFF (23.9B).
SOCYZCFFSOC / YZCFF
Capitalization2.74B4.4B62%
EBITDAN/A1.89B-
Gain YTD20.3060.000-
P/E RatioN/A10.90-
RevenueN/A80.4B-
Total Cash189M4.87B4%
Total Debt873M23.9B4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
YZCFF: Fundamental Ratings
YZCFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
27
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
93
SMR RATING
1..100
77
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
72
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
83
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SOCYZCFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
32%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
30%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
19%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
22%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
16%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
15%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
50%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SOC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PHRAX18.300.10
+0.55%
Virtus Duff & Phelps Real Estate Secs A
QUAYX72.870.05
+0.07%
AB Small Cap Growth Advisor
SZCIX53.25-0.08
-0.15%
DWS Small Cap Core Inst
ALLIX120.17-0.31
-0.26%
AB Large Cap Growth I
HUSIX27.11-0.20
-0.73%
Huber Small Cap Value Inv

SOC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SOC has been loosely correlated with PTEN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SOC jumps, then PTEN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SOC
1D Price
Change %
SOC100%
-7.49%
PTEN - SOC
42%
Loosely correlated
-4.10%
YZCFF - SOC
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SDRL - SOC
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NE - SOC
33%
Loosely correlated
-1.64%
PDS - SOC
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.84%
More

YZCFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that YZCFF and WEEEF have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that YZCFF and WEEEF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To YZCFF
1D Price
Change %
YZCFF100%
N/A
WEEEF - YZCFF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AKTAF - YZCFF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.14%
NE - YZCFF
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.64%
ESVIF - YZCFF
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.99%
SOC - YZCFF
3%
Poorly correlated
-7.49%
More