Advertisement
SNZZF vs SSMXY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SNZZF is a Buy and SSMXY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SNZZF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSSMXY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- SNZZF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SSMXY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SNZZF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SSMXY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- SNZZF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 1 bearish.
- SSMXY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
SNZZF (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SSMXY (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was -2.60% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -2.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.35%.
Reported Earning Dates
SSMXY is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Medical/Nursing Services (-2.78% weekly)The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
| SNZZF | SSMXY | SNZZF / SSMXY | |
| Capitalization | 86.1M | 5.9B | 1% |
| EBITDA | -80.95M | 117B | -0% |
| Gain YTD | 13.909 | -4.000 | -348% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 19.44 | - |
| Revenue | 89.7M | 499B | 0% |
| Total Cash | 107M | 86.5B | 0% |
| Total Debt | 14.5M | 63.6B | 0% |
SNZZF | SSMXY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 48 | 71 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 45 Fair valued | 9 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 84 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 91 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SSMXY's Valuation (9) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SNZZF (45). This means that SSMXY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SNZZF’s over the last 12 months.
SSMXY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SNZZF (100). This means that SSMXY’s stock grew similarly to SNZZF’s over the last 12 months.
SNZZF's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as SSMXY (100). This means that SNZZF’s stock grew similarly to SSMXY’s over the last 12 months.
SNZZF's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as SSMXY (84). This means that SNZZF’s stock grew similarly to SSMXY’s over the last 12 months.
SSMXY's P/E Growth Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as SNZZF (100). This means that SSMXY’s stock grew similarly to SNZZF’s over the last 12 months.
| SNZZF | SSMXY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 68% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 27% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 19% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 24 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 72% |
Advertisement
SNZZF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SNZZF and COO have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SNZZF and COO's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SNZZF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNZZF | 100% | N/A | ||
| COO - SNZZF | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.64% | ||
| MYO - SNZZF | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.82% | ||
| COCH - SNZZF | 21% Poorly correlated | -8.57% | ||
| RDNT - SNZZF | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.07% | ||
| SSMXY - SNZZF | 10% Poorly correlated | -0.43% | ||
More | ||||
SSMXY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SSMXY has been loosely correlated with TRUMY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SSMXY jumps, then TRUMY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SSMXY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SSMXY | 100% | -0.43% | ||
| TRUMY - SSMXY | 45% Loosely correlated | -1.66% | ||
| HOCPY - SSMXY | 44% Loosely correlated | +3.34% | ||
| OLYMY - SSMXY | 33% Loosely correlated | -1.24% | ||
| ESLOY - SSMXY | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.59% | ||
| ISRG - SSMXY | 28% Poorly correlated | -3.59% | ||
More | ||||