Advertisement
SNZZF vs SONVY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SNZZF is a Hold and SONVY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SNZZF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSONVY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- SNZZF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SONVY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SNZZF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SONVY’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).
- SNZZF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
- SONVY’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
SNZZF (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SONVY (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was +2.84% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -0.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.21%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Medical/Nursing Services (-0.02% weekly)The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
| SNZZF | SONVY | SNZZF / SONVY | |
| Capitalization | 107M | 17.7B | 1% |
| EBITDA | -84.06M | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 33.814 | -6.109 | -554% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 26.69 | - |
| Revenue | 80.6M | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 132M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 14.9M | N/A | - |
SNZZF | SONVY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 43 Fair valued | 19 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 68 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | 48 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 64 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SONVY's Valuation (19) in the null industry is in the same range as SNZZF (43). This means that SONVY’s stock grew similarly to SNZZF’s over the last 12 months.
SONVY's Profit vs Risk Rating (68) in the null industry is in the same range as SNZZF (100). This means that SONVY’s stock grew similarly to SNZZF’s over the last 12 months.
SONVY's SMR Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SNZZF (97). This means that SONVY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SNZZF’s over the last 12 months.
SNZZF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as SONVY (56). This means that SNZZF’s stock grew similarly to SONVY’s over the last 12 months.
SONVY's P/E Growth Rating (64) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SNZZF (100). This means that SONVY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SNZZF’s over the last 12 months.
| SNZZF | SONVY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 40% | 5 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 44% | 4 days ago 54% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 38% | 4 days ago 56% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 23% | 4 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 25% | 4 days ago 65% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 32% | 4 days ago 57% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 63% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 29 days ago 90% | 14 days ago 59% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 56% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 55% |
Advertisement
SNZZF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SNZZF and SONVY have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SNZZF and SONVY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SNZZF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNZZF | 100% | N/A | ||
| SONVY - SNZZF | 12% Poorly correlated | +1.71% | ||
| SSMXY - SNZZF | 9% Poorly correlated | +2.26% | ||
| SNNUF - SNZZF | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SMTI - SNZZF | 5% Poorly correlated | -1.38% | ||
| SONVF - SNZZF | 3% Poorly correlated | +3.31% | ||
More | ||||
SONVY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SONVY and NMTC have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SONVY and NMTC's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SONVY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SONVY | 100% | +1.71% | ||
| NMTC - SONVY | 22% Poorly correlated | +8.47% | ||
| INFU - SONVY | 20% Poorly correlated | -4.42% | ||
| SONVF - SONVY | 14% Poorly correlated | +3.31% | ||
| SNZZF - SONVY | 12% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SMTI - SONVY | 11% Poorly correlated | -1.38% | ||
More | ||||