Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SNWCX vs SSGSX
SNWCX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts SNWCX vs SSGSX
Easterly Snow Small Cap Value C
Price$51.43
Change-$1.03 (-1.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.87M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$42.53
Change-$0.78 (-1.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.52B
SNWCX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SNWCX vs. SSGSX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SNWCX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.52B vs. SNWCX (26.9M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than SNWCX: SSGSX (0.52) vs SNWCX (0.06). SNWCX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: SNWCX (15 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SNWCX (2.90) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. SNWCX (14.00). SNWCX (2500) and SSGSX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SNWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.71 vs. SSGSX (-8.36). SNWCX return over 5 years is better than : 128.09 vs. SSGSX (21.72).
| SNWCX | SSGSX | SNWCX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.25 | 1.26 | 179% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.90 | 1.26 | 230% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.084 | -8.400 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 26.9M | 5.52B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 0.52 | 11% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.71 | -8.36 | -20% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.49 | -3.90 | -936% |
| Returns for 5 years | 128.09 | 21.72 | 590% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.33 | 7.10 | 991% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers