Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SNWAX vs WCMFX
SNWAX vs WCMFX Comparison
Open Charts SNWAX vs WCMFX
Easterly Snow Small Cap Value A
Price$72.87
Change+$0.21 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.14M
WCM SMID Quality Val Fd Institutional
Price$3.62
Change+$0.01 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.61M
SNWAX vs WCMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SNWAX vs. WCMFX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SNWAX is a Hold and WCMFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SNWAX has more cash in the bank: 36.1M vs. WCMFX (1.61M). SNWAX pays higher dividends than WCMFX: SNWAX (0.61) vs WCMFX (0.00). SNWAX was incepted earlier than WCMFX: SNWAX (15 years) vs WCMFX (6 years). SNWAX (2.05) is less costly to investors than WCMFX (1.45). SNWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. WCMFX (15.00). SNWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMFX: SNWAX (2500) vs WCMFX (100000). SNWAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.73 vs. WCMFX (-70.39). SNWAX return over 5 years is better than : 94.88 vs. WCMFX (-65.45).
| SNWAX | WCMFX | SNWAX / WCMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.90 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 1.45 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.097 | -69.866 | -32% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 100000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36.1M | 1.61M | 2,238% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.73 | -70.39 | -31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.51 | -63.72 | -104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 94.88 | -65.45 | -145% |
| Returns for 10 years | 178.74 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement