Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SNWAX vs WCMFX
SNWAX vs WCMFX Comparison
Open Charts SNWAX vs WCMFX
Easterly Snow Small Cap Value A
Price$69.20
Change+$2.01 (+2.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets31.93M
WCM SMID Quality Val Fd Institutional
Price$11.48
Change+$0.16 (+1.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.79M
SNWAX vs WCMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SNWAX vs. WCMFX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SNWAX is a Hold and WCMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SNWAX has more cash in the bank: 31.9M vs. WCMFX (21.8M). SNWAX pays higher dividends than WCMFX: SNWAX (0.63) vs WCMFX (0.00). SNWAX was incepted earlier than WCMFX: SNWAX (15 years) vs WCMFX (6 years). SNWAX (2.05) is less costly to investors than WCMFX (1.45). SNWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. WCMFX (15.00). SNWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMFX: SNWAX (2500) vs WCMFX (100000). SNWAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.78 vs. WCMFX (-20.62). SNWAX return over 5 years is better than : 132.28 vs. WCMFX (23.45).
| SNWAX | WCMFX | SNWAX / WCMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.90 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 1.45 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.905 | -5.509 | -234% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 100000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 31.9M | 21.8M | 146% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.78 | -20.62 | -43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.89 | 16.46 | 394% |
| Returns for 5 years | 132.28 | 23.45 | 564% |
| Returns for 10 years | 146.22 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement