Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SNWAX vs WCMFX
SNWAX vs WCMFX Comparison
Open Charts SNWAX vs WCMFX
Easterly Snow Small Cap Value A
Price$67.42
Change-$1.35 (-1.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.79M
WCM SMID Quality Val Fd Institutional
Price$10.89
Change-$0.14 (-1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.4M
SNWAX vs WCMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SNWAX vs. WCMFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SNWAX is a Buy and WCMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SNWAX has more cash in the bank: 32.8M vs. WCMFX (7.41M). SNWAX pays higher dividends than WCMFX: SNWAX (0.64) vs WCMFX (0.00). SNWAX was incepted earlier than WCMFX: SNWAX (15 years) vs WCMFX (6 years). SNWAX (2.05) is less costly to investors than WCMFX (1.45). SNWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. WCMFX (15.00). SNWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMFX: SNWAX (2500) vs WCMFX (100000). SNWAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.35 vs. WCMFX (-24.81). SNWAX return over 5 years is better than : 110.00 vs. WCMFX (15.14).
| SNWAX | WCMFX | SNWAX / WCMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.90 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 1.45 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.560 | -7.930 | -196% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 100000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 32.8M | 7.41M | 443% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.64 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.35 | -24.81 | -30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.37 | 5.15 | 959% |
| Returns for 5 years | 110.00 | 15.14 | 727% |
| Returns for 10 years | 166.87 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement