Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SNTFX vs VFWPX
SNTFX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts SNTFX vs VFWPX
Steward Values Enhanced International R6
Price$20.58
Change+$0.18 (+0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets252.32M
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$145.32
Change+$0.81 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.34B
SNTFX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SNTFX vs. VFWPX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SNTFX is a Hold and VFWPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 71.3B vs. SNTFX (252M). SNTFX pays higher dividends than VFWPX: SNTFX (2.91) vs VFWPX (2.68). SNTFX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: SNTFX (8 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). SNTFX (0.66) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). SNTFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). SNTFX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: SNTFX (0) vs VFWPX (100000000). VFWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.96 vs. SNTFX (2.38). VFWPX return over 5 years is better than : 40.89 vs. SNTFX (36.70).
| SNTFX | VFWPX | SNTFX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.03 | 2,200% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.03 | 2,200% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.086 | 21.701 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 252M | 71.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.91 | 2.68 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.38 | 15.96 | 15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.97 | 47.91 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.70 | 40.89 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 69.76 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers