SNPMF
Price
$0.55
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
90.53B
TTFNF
Price
$62.92
Change
+$1.14 (+1.85%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
134.77B
Interact to see
Advertisement

SNPMF vs TTFNF

Header iconSNPMF vs TTFNF Comparison
Open Charts SNPMF vs TTFNFBanner chart's image
China Petroleum & Chemical
Price$0.55
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$75.67K
Capitalization90.53B
TotalEnergies SE
Price$62.92
Change+$1.14 (+1.85%)
Volume$659
Capitalization134.77B
SNPMF vs TTFNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SNPMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TTFNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SNPMF vs. TTFNF commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SNPMF is a Hold and TTFNF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (SNPMF: $0.55 vs. TTFNF: $62.92)
Brand notoriety: SNPMF and TTFNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Integrated Oil industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SNPMF: 431% vs. TTFNF: 2%
Market capitalization -- SNPMF: $90.53B vs. TTFNF: $134.77B
SNPMF [@Integrated Oil] is valued at $90.53B. TTFNF’s [@Integrated Oil] market capitalization is $134.77B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Integrated Oil] industry ranges from $453.99B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Integrated Oil] industry is $56.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SNPMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTTFNF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SNPMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TTFNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TTFNF is a better buy in the long-term than SNPMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SNPMF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TTFNF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SNPMF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TTFNF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TTFNF is a better buy in the short-term than SNPMF.

Price Growth

SNPMF (@Integrated Oil) experienced а -6.80% price change this week, while TTFNF (@Integrated Oil) price change was +2.58% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Integrated Oil industry was +0.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.25%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Integrated Oil (+0.61% weekly)

Integrated oil companies are involved across nearly the entire oil value chain – from upstream operations like exploration and production, to downstream functions of refining and marketing. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation and BP are major integrated oil companies. Their bottom lines’ response to crude oil prices could depend on the proportion of upstream vs. downstream businesses; for example, if a company has substantial downstream business, the adverse impact on their upstream business due to falling crude prices could be mitigated by benefits to its downstream business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TTFNF($135B) has a higher market cap than SNPMF($90.5B). TTFNF has higher P/E ratio than SNPMF: TTFNF (11.40) vs SNPMF (9.77). TTFNF YTD gains are higher at: 14.400 vs. SNPMF (3.598).
SNPMFTTFNFSNPMF / TTFNF
Capitalization90.5B135B67%
EBITDAN/A38.9B-
Gain YTD3.59814.40025%
P/E Ratio9.7711.4086%
RevenueN/A187B-
Total CashN/A25.6B-
Total DebtN/A62.2B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SNPMF vs TTFNF: Fundamental Ratings
SNPMF
TTFNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8234
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7141
SMR RATING
1..100
7766
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5758
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3416
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SNPMF's Valuation (20) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TTFNF (89). This means that SNPMF’s stock grew significantly faster than TTFNF’s over the last 12 months.

TTFNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as SNPMF (71). This means that TTFNF’s stock grew similarly to SNPMF’s over the last 12 months.

TTFNF's SMR Rating (66) in the null industry is in the same range as SNPMF (77). This means that TTFNF’s stock grew similarly to SNPMF’s over the last 12 months.

SNPMF's Price Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as TTFNF (58). This means that SNPMF’s stock grew similarly to TTFNF’s over the last 12 months.

TTFNF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is in the same range as SNPMF (34). This means that TTFNF’s stock grew similarly to SNPMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SNPMFTTFNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
49%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SNPMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TTFNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HLXB9.90N/A
N/A
Helix Acquisition Corp
SLGN46.48-0.52
-1.11%
Silgan Holdings
PNC191.27-3.30
-1.70%
PNC Financial Services Group
KBDC15.03-0.30
-1.96%
Kayne Anderson BDC Inc.
SYTA3.22-0.47
-12.74%
Siyata Mobile Inc

SNPMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SNPMF and PCCYF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SNPMF and PCCYF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SNPMF
1D Price
Change %
SNPMF100%
-0.46%
PCCYF - SNPMF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.52%
TTFNF - SNPMF
9%
Poorly correlated
+1.85%
SEGYY - SNPMF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WDGJY - SNPMF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
STOHF - SNPMF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TTFNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TTFNF has been loosely correlated with OMVKY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TTFNF jumps, then OMVKY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TTFNF
1D Price
Change %
TTFNF100%
+1.85%
OMVKY - TTFNF
34%
Loosely correlated
+2.28%
TTE - TTFNF
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.17%
SHEL - TTFNF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.10%
BP - TTFNF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.55%
CVX - TTFNF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.90%
More