SNOW
Price
$222.61
Change
+$0.69 (+0.31%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
53.65B
51 days until earnings call
TMSNY
Price
$73.06
Change
-$0.18 (-0.25%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
6.18B
Interact to see
Advertisement

SNOW vs TMSNY

Header iconSNOW vs TMSNY Comparison
Open Charts SNOW vs TMSNYBanner chart's image
Snowflake
Price$222.61
Change+$0.69 (+0.31%)
Volume$4.92M
Capitalization53.65B
Temenos AG
Price$73.06
Change-$0.18 (-0.25%)
Volume$1.73K
Capitalization6.18B
SNOW vs TMSNY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SNOW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TMSNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SNOW vs. TMSNY commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SNOW is a Buy and TMSNY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (SNOW: $222.61 vs. TMSNY: $73.06)
Brand notoriety: SNOW and TMSNY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SNOW: 112% vs. TMSNY: 25%
Market capitalization -- SNOW: $53.65B vs. TMSNY: $6.18B
SNOW [@Packaged Software] is valued at $53.65B. TMSNY’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $6.18B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SNOW’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTMSNY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SNOW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TMSNY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TMSNY is a better buy in the long-term than SNOW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SNOW’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TMSNY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SNOW’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TMSNY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SNOW is a better buy in the short-term than TMSNY.

Price Growth

SNOW (@Packaged Software) experienced а +5.01% price change this week, while TMSNY (@Packaged Software) price change was -0.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +3.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.84%.

Reported Earning Dates

SNOW is expected to report earnings on Aug 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+3.15% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SNOW($53.6B) has a higher market cap than TMSNY($6.18B). SNOW YTD gains are higher at: 44.168 vs. TMSNY (6.603). TMSNY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 311M vs. SNOW (-974.87M). SNOW has more cash in the bank: 3.85B vs. TMSNY (112M). SNOW has less debt than TMSNY: SNOW (288M) vs TMSNY (841M). SNOW has higher revenues than TMSNY: SNOW (2.81B) vs TMSNY (955M).
SNOWTMSNYSNOW / TMSNY
Capitalization53.6B6.18B868%
EBITDA-974.87M311M-313%
Gain YTD44.1686.603669%
P/E RatioN/A52.36-
Revenue2.81B955M294%
Total Cash3.85B112M3,434%
Total Debt288M841M34%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SNOW vs TMSNY: Fundamental Ratings
SNOW
TMSNY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5031
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
53100
SMR RATING
1..100
9740
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3856
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10072
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TMSNY's Valuation (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SNOW (90) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that TMSNY’s stock grew significantly faster than SNOW’s over the last 12 months.

SNOW's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TMSNY (100) in the null industry. This means that SNOW’s stock grew somewhat faster than TMSNY’s over the last 12 months.

TMSNY's SMR Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SNOW (97) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that TMSNY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SNOW’s over the last 12 months.

SNOW's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as TMSNY (56) in the null industry. This means that SNOW’s stock grew similarly to TMSNY’s over the last 12 months.

TMSNY's P/E Growth Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as SNOW (100) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that TMSNY’s stock grew similarly to SNOW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SNOWTMSNY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SNOW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TMSNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XLI146.791.45
+1.00%
The Industrial Select Sector SPDR® ETF
HISF44.560.10
+0.22%
First Trust High Income Strat Foc ETF
FMHI46.660.02
+0.04%
First Trust Municipal High Income ETF
UMAR37.48-0.01
-0.02%
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra BffrETF™-Mar
SIJ12.76-0.54
-4.02%
ProShares UltraShort Industrials

SNOW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNOW has been closely correlated with MDB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SNOW jumps, then MDB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SNOW
1D Price
Change %
SNOW100%
+0.31%
MDB - SNOW
68%
Closely correlated
+0.34%
NET - SNOW
60%
Loosely correlated
+2.07%
DDOG - SNOW
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.73%
HUBS - SNOW
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.52%
CYBR - SNOW
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.40%
More

TMSNY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMSNY has been loosely correlated with DAVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TMSNY jumps, then DAVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TMSNY
1D Price
Change %
TMSNY100%
-0.25%
DAVA - TMSNY
56%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SNOW - TMSNY
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.31%
LPSN - TMSNY
40%
Loosely correlated
-4.14%
EVTC - TMSNY
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.75%
EB - TMSNY
36%
Loosely correlated
+3.05%
More