SNMSF
Price
$13.98
Change
+$0.43 (+3.17%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.41B
29 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
YAMCF
Price
$6.66
Change
-$0.37 (-5.26%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
3.35B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SNMSF vs YAMCF

Header iconSNMSF vs YAMCF Comparison
Open Charts SNMSF vs YAMCFBanner chart's image
SPIN MASTER
Price$13.98
Change+$0.43 (+3.17%)
Volume$10.37K
Capitalization1.41B
Yamaha
Price$6.66
Change-$0.37 (-5.26%)
Volume$251
Capitalization3.35B
SNMSF vs YAMCF Comparison Chart in %
SNMSF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
YAMCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SNMSF vs. YAMCF commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SNMSF is a Hold and YAMCF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (SNMSF: $13.98 vs. YAMCF: $7.19)
Brand notoriety: SNMSF and YAMCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SNMSF: 82% vs. YAMCF: 24%
Market capitalization -- SNMSF: $1.41B vs. YAMCF: $3.35B
SNMSF [@Recreational Products] is valued at $1.41B. YAMCF’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $3.35B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $28.45B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $4.5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SNMSF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileYAMCF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • SNMSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • YAMCF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, YAMCF is a better buy in the long-term than SNMSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SNMSF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while YAMCF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SNMSF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • YAMCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SNMSF is a better buy in the short-term than YAMCF.

Price Growth

SNMSF (@Recreational Products) experienced а -2.07% price change this week, while YAMCF (@Recreational Products) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was -0.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.55%.

Reported Earning Dates

SNMSF is expected to report earnings on Mar 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Recreational Products (-0.88% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
YAMCF($3.35B) has a higher market cap than SNMSF($1.41B). YAMCF has higher P/E ratio than SNMSF: YAMCF (29.08) vs SNMSF (25.89). YAMCF YTD gains are higher at: 11.646 vs. SNMSF (0.576). YAMCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 25.4B vs. SNMSF (247M). YAMCF has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. SNMSF (120M). SNMSF has less debt than YAMCF: SNMSF (565M) vs YAMCF (21.5B). YAMCF has higher revenues than SNMSF: YAMCF (450B) vs SNMSF (2.14B).
SNMSFYAMCFSNMSF / YAMCF
Capitalization1.41B3.35B42%
EBITDA247M25.4B1%
Gain YTD0.57611.6465%
P/E Ratio25.8929.0889%
Revenue2.14B450B0%
Total Cash120M112B0%
Total Debt565M21.5B3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SNMSF vs YAMCF: Fundamental Ratings
SNMSF
YAMCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7328
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
856
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7750
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9848
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4950

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SNMSF's Valuation (24) in the null industry is in the same range as YAMCF (24). This means that SNMSF’s stock grew similarly to YAMCF’s over the last 12 months.

SNMSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as YAMCF (100). This means that SNMSF’s stock grew similarly to YAMCF’s over the last 12 months.

YAMCF's SMR Rating (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SNMSF (85). This means that YAMCF’s stock grew significantly faster than SNMSF’s over the last 12 months.

YAMCF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as SNMSF (77). This means that YAMCF’s stock grew similarly to SNMSF’s over the last 12 months.

YAMCF's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SNMSF (98). This means that YAMCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SNMSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SNMSFYAMCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
22%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
60%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
14%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SNMSF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
YAMCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CEKRX18.420.20
+1.10%
Columbia Emerging Markets Inst2
JEMOX46.600.30
+0.65%
JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity R5
TEFQX4.63-0.01
-0.22%
Firsthand Technology Opportunities
PSIJX8.25-0.05
-0.60%
Principal SmallCap Growth I J
KINAX78.97-1.18
-1.47%
Kinetics Internet Adv A

SNMSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SNMSF and OSW have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SNMSF and OSW's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SNMSF
1D Price
Change %
SNMSF100%
+1.67%
OSW - SNMSF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.68%
GOLF - SNMSF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SHMDF - SNMSF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SMNNY - SNMSF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.62%
THUPY - SNMSF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

YAMCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, YAMCF has been loosely correlated with CGROF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if YAMCF jumps, then CGROF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To YAMCF
1D Price
Change %
YAMCF100%
N/A
CGROF - YAMCF
55%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GDHG - YAMCF
25%
Poorly correlated
+5.63%
PYHOF - YAMCF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SNMSF - YAMCF
1%
Poorly correlated
+1.67%
THUPY - YAMCF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More