SNGNF
Price
$3.02
Change
+$0.04 (+1.34%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
32.77B
SRHBY
Price
$9.38
Change
-$0.27 (-2.80%)
Updated
May 15 closing price
Capitalization
1.35B
Interact to see
Advertisement

SNGNF vs SRHBY

Header iconSNGNF vs SRHBY Comparison
Open Charts SNGNF vs SRHBYBanner chart's image
Singapore Telecommunications
Price$3.02
Change+$0.04 (+1.34%)
Volume$4.4K
Capitalization32.77B
Starhub
Price$9.38
Change-$0.27 (-2.80%)
Volume$203
Capitalization1.35B
SNGNF vs SRHBY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SNGNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SRHBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SNGNF vs. SRHBY commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SNGNF is a StrongBuy and SRHBY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (SNGNF: $3.02 vs. SRHBY: $9.38)
Brand notoriety: SNGNF and SRHBY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Wireless Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SNGNF: 82% vs. SRHBY: 89%
Market capitalization -- SNGNF: $32.77B vs. SRHBY: $1.35B
SNGNF [@Wireless Telecommunications] is valued at $32.77B. SRHBY’s [@Wireless Telecommunications] market capitalization is $1.35B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry ranges from $12.88T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry is $17.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SNGNF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSRHBY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SNGNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SRHBY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SRHBY is a better buy in the long-term than SNGNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SNGNF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SRHBY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SNGNF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SRHBY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SRHBY is a better buy in the short-term than SNGNF.

Price Growth

SNGNF (@Wireless Telecommunications) experienced а +1.43% price change this week, while SRHBY (@Wireless Telecommunications) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wireless Telecommunications industry was +1.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +38.57%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Wireless Telecommunications (+1.70% weekly)

Wireless Telecom includes companies that sell wireless antenna or satellite-based communication services. This is the fastest-growing area in communications, as more and more communication and computing happen on mobile devices and cloud-based platforms. Wireless telecom is a key industry for global connectivity, and has even further room for growth in emerging markets and in rural parts of developed nations. People’s growing need for speed in data connectivity, higher resolution, and smoother video streaming and multimedia applications should drive growth and competition within this segment. T-Mobile US, Inc., Vodafone Group, and Sprint Corporation are some major providers of wireless telecom.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SNGNF($32.8B) has a higher market cap than SRHBY($1.35B). SRHBY has higher P/E ratio than SNGNF: SRHBY (32.05) vs SNGNF (18.98). SNGNF YTD gains are higher at: 33.004 vs. SRHBY (8.899). SNGNF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.57B vs. SRHBY (402M). SNGNF has higher revenues than SRHBY: SNGNF (14.6B) vs SRHBY (2.33B).
SNGNFSRHBYSNGNF / SRHBY
Capitalization32.8B1.35B2,431%
EBITDA5.57B402M1,386%
Gain YTD33.0048.899371%
P/E Ratio18.9832.0559%
Revenue14.6B2.33B627%
Total Cash1.67BN/A-
Total Debt10.9BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SNGNF vs SRHBY: Fundamental Ratings
SNGNF
SRHBY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
58
Fair valued
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1325
SMR RATING
1..100
9741
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4352
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9868
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SRHBY's Valuation (34) in the null industry is in the same range as SNGNF (58). This means that SRHBY’s stock grew similarly to SNGNF’s over the last 12 months.

SNGNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the null industry is in the same range as SRHBY (25). This means that SNGNF’s stock grew similarly to SRHBY’s over the last 12 months.

SRHBY's SMR Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SNGNF (97). This means that SRHBY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SNGNF’s over the last 12 months.

SNGNF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as SRHBY (52). This means that SNGNF’s stock grew similarly to SRHBY’s over the last 12 months.

SRHBY's P/E Growth Rating (68) in the null industry is in the same range as SNGNF (98). This means that SRHBY’s stock grew similarly to SNGNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SNGNFSRHBY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
39%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
19%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
14%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
41%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
17%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
17%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SNGNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SRHBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WTTR9.110.07
+0.77%
Select Water Solutions
GVA93.900.26
+0.28%
Granite Construction
SUPX10.37-0.12
-1.14%
Super X AI Technology Limited
CNC33.31-0.47
-1.39%
Centene Corp
HKIT1.34-0.02
-1.43%
Hitek Global

SNGNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SNGNF and SFTBY have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SNGNF and SFTBY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SNGNF
1D Price
Change %
SNGNF100%
N/A
SFTBY - SNGNF
14%
Poorly correlated
+0.19%
SFTBF - SNGNF
12%
Poorly correlated
+2.16%
SGAPY - SNGNF
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.07%
TEFOF - SNGNF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SCMWY - SNGNF
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.18%
More

SRHBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SRHBY and TCMFF have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SRHBY and TCMFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SRHBY
1D Price
Change %
SRHBY100%
N/A
TCMFF - SRHBY
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TIAIY - SRHBY
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.76%
SMNUF - SRHBY
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SNGNF - SRHBY
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TELNF - SRHBY
-0%
Poorly correlated
+0.13%
More