SNGCF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
WVMDF
Price
$0.73
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
Ad is loading...

SNGCF vs WVMDF

Header iconSNGCF vs WVMDF Comparison
Open Charts SNGCF vs WVMDFBanner chart's image
Sanu Gold
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.6K
CapitalizationN/A
West Vault Mining
Price$0.73
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.5K
CapitalizationN/A
SNGCF vs WVMDF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SNGCF vs. WVMDF commentary
Nov 16, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SNGCF is a Hold and WVMDF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 16, 2024
Stock price -- (SNGCF: $0.05 vs. WVMDF: $0.73)
Brand notoriety: SNGCF and WVMDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SNGCF: 2% vs. WVMDF: 12%
Market capitalization -- SNGCF: $4.19M vs. WVMDF: $39.9M
SNGCF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $4.19M. WVMDF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $39.9M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SNGCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWVMDF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SNGCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WVMDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both SNGCF and WVMDF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

SNGCF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +5.81% price change this week, while WVMDF (@Precious Metals) price change was -1.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -4.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.85%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-4.55% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WVMDF($39.9M) has a higher market cap than SNGCF($4.19M). SNGCF YTD gains are higher at: 25.000 vs. WVMDF (5.543). WVMDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -878.78K vs. SNGCF (-3.16M). WVMDF has more cash in the bank: 5.7M vs. SNGCF (2.3M). SNGCF (0) and WVMDF (0) have equivalent revenues.
SNGCFWVMDFSNGCF / WVMDF
Capitalization4.19M39.9M11%
EBITDA-3.16M-878.78K360%
Gain YTD25.0005.543451%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash2.3M5.7M40%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WVMDF: Fundamental Ratings
WVMDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
76
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
74
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
55
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

SNGCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SNGCF and GLNS have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SNGCF and GLNS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SNGCF
1D Price
Change %
SNGCF100%
+6.43%
GLNS - SNGCF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WVMDF - SNGCF
21%
Poorly correlated
+5.04%
ATLX - SNGCF
16%
Poorly correlated
-2.13%
FSTTF - SNGCF
13%
Poorly correlated
-1.21%
GGGOF - SNGCF
10%
Poorly correlated
-4.23%
More

WVMDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WVMDF and SNGCF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WVMDF and SNGCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WVMDF
1D Price
Change %
WVMDF100%
+5.04%
SNGCF - WVMDF
21%
Poorly correlated
+6.43%
WRRZF - WVMDF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WDOFF - WVMDF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WTHVF - WVMDF
1%
Poorly correlated
+13.56%
XXMMF - WVMDF
-3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More