SNCPF vs TCLHF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SNCPF is a Hold and TCLHF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SNCPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTCLHF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- SNCPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TCLHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Price Growth
SNCPF (@Electronics/Appliances) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TCLHF (@Electronics/Appliances) price change was -7.45% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics/Appliances industry was -0.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.48%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronics/Appliances (-0.79% weekly)TVs, telephones, washing machines, home speakers and even home-office equipment like computers and printers…the list is virtually endless when it comes to consumer electronics and appliances. And, with ‘smarthomes’ increasingly becoming the reality, we could see a sharp surge in high-tech gadgets (including robotic appliances) making their way into our homes– and therefore spelling plenty opportunities in the related industries. Consumers account for 70% of US GDP, and their purchases of high-functioning electronics could make significant dents in the economy’s health. Sony Corp., Whirlpool and iRobot are some of the major consumer electronics/appliances makers.
| SNCPF | TCLHF | SNCPF / TCLHF | |
| Capitalization | 307M | 1.27B | 24% |
| EBITDA | 19.8B | 2.96B | 670% |
| Gain YTD | 202.613 | 109.677 | 185% |
| P/E Ratio | 8.23 | 21.98 | 37% |
| Revenue | 45.4B | 68.7B | 66% |
| Total Cash | 26.3B | 11.1B | 237% |
| Total Debt | 2.88B | 7.48B | 38% |
SNCPF | TCLHF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 46 | 91 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 39 Fair valued | 20 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 27 | 79 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 36 | 87 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 94 | 80 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 47 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TCLHF's Valuation (20) in the null industry is in the same range as SNCPF (39). This means that TCLHF’s stock grew similarly to SNCPF’s over the last 12 months.
SNCPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TCLHF (79). This means that SNCPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TCLHF’s over the last 12 months.
SNCPF's SMR Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TCLHF (87). This means that SNCPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TCLHF’s over the last 12 months.
SNCPF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as TCLHF (50). This means that SNCPF’s stock grew similarly to TCLHF’s over the last 12 months.
TCLHF's P/E Growth Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as SNCPF (94). This means that TCLHF’s stock grew similarly to SNCPF’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
SNCPF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SNCPF and XIACF have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SNCPF and XIACF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SNCPF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNCPF | 100% | N/A | ||
| XIACF - SNCPF | 3% Poorly correlated | +0.83% | ||
| RIME - SNCPF | 1% Poorly correlated | -12.56% | ||
| SWDHF - SNCPF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SHCAF - SNCPF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TKLS - SNCPF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
TCLHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that TCLHF and RIME have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TCLHF and RIME's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TCLHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCLHF | 100% | +2.20% | ||
| RIME - TCLHF | 5% Poorly correlated | -12.56% | ||
| SHCAF - TCLHF | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TKLS - TCLHF | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| XIACY - TCLHF | -0% Poorly correlated | +1.33% | ||
| SNCPF - TCLHF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||