Advertisement
SNCPF vs SWDHF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SNCPF is a Hold and SWDHF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SNCPF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSWDHF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- SNCPF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- SWDHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Price Growth
SNCPF (@Computer Peripherals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SWDHF (@Computer Peripherals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Peripherals industry was -1.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.00%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Peripherals (-1.88% weekly)Computer peripherals connect to a computer system to add functionality or to get information from or put information into computers. Think hard disk drive, data storage systems, cloud storage devices, printer and scanner, or mouse, keyboard etc. Some of the major companies operating in the computer peripherals industry include Western Digital Corporation, Seagate Technology PLC, NetApp, Inc., Zebra Technologies Corporation, and Xerox Holdings Corp.
| SNCPF | SWDHF | SNCPF / SWDHF | |
| Capitalization | 1.13B | 1.74B | 65% |
| EBITDA | 22.6B | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | 0.000 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 8.89 | 25.68 | 35% |
| Revenue | 9.74B | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 3.15B | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 2.86B | N/A | - |
SNCPF | SWDHF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 48 | 42 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 25 Undervalued | 16 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 47 | 74 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 14 | 73 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | 4 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 55 | 55 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SWDHF's Valuation (16) in the null industry is in the same range as SNCPF (25). This means that SWDHF’s stock grew similarly to SNCPF’s over the last 12 months.
SNCPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as SWDHF (74). This means that SNCPF’s stock grew similarly to SWDHF’s over the last 12 months.
SNCPF's SMR Rating (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SWDHF (73). This means that SNCPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SWDHF’s over the last 12 months.
SWDHF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as SNCPF (50). This means that SWDHF’s stock grew similarly to SNCPF’s over the last 12 months.
SWDHF's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SNCPF (40). This means that SWDHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SNCPF’s over the last 12 months.
| SNCPF | SWDHF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 17% | 2 days ago 27% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 16% | 2 days ago 27% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SFDYX | 27.83 | 0.08 | +0.29% |
| SEI Mid-Cap Y (SIMT) | |||
| PLVIX | 17.96 | 0.03 | +0.17% |
| Principal Large Cap Value III Inst | |||
| PASTX | 59.56 | -0.44 | -0.73% |
| T. Rowe Price Science & Tech Adv | |||
| ETHSX | 13.22 | -0.18 | -1.34% |
| Eaton Vance Worldwide Health Sci A | |||
| MSSGX | 15.03 | -0.24 | -1.57% |
| Morgan Stanley Inst Inception I | |||
SNCPF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SNCPF and XIACF have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SNCPF and XIACF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SNCPF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNCPF | 100% | N/A | ||
| XIACF - SNCPF | 7% Poorly correlated | -3.33% | ||
| RIME - SNCPF | 5% Poorly correlated | -5.93% | ||
| XIACY - SNCPF | 4% Poorly correlated | -2.09% | ||
| SWDHF - SNCPF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SHCAF - SNCPF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
SWDHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SWDHF and SHCAY have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SWDHF and SHCAY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SWDHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SWDHF | 100% | N/A | ||
| SHCAY - SWDHF | 7% Poorly correlated | +0.32% | ||
| RIME - SWDHF | 1% Poorly correlated | -5.93% | ||
| SNCPF - SWDHF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TCLHF - SWDHF | 0% Poorly correlated | +2.58% | ||
| SHCAF - SWDHF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||