SMSZF
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
852.84M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SPNUF
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
1.56B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SMSZF vs SPNUF

Header iconSMSZF vs SPNUF Comparison
Open Charts SMSZF vs SPNUFBanner chart's image
SMS
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$200
Capitalization852.84M
Spirent Communications
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$500
Capitalization1.56B
SMSZF vs SPNUF Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SMSZF vs. SPNUF commentary
Feb 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMSZF is a Hold and SPNUF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 03, 2026
Stock price -- (SMSZF: $8.56 vs. SPNUF: $2.67)
Brand notoriety: SMSZF and SPNUF are both not notable
SMSZF represents the Services to the Health Industry, while SPNUF is part of the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SMSZF: 100% vs. SPNUF: 100%
Market capitalization -- SMSZF: $852.84M vs. SPNUF: $1.56B
SMSZF [@Services to the Health Industry] is valued at $852.84M. SPNUF’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $1.56B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry ranges from $33.43B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.14T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry is $1.58B. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $22.61B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SMSZF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSPNUF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • SMSZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SPNUF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SPNUF is a better buy in the long-term than SMSZF.

Price Growth

SMSZF (@Services to the Health Industry) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SPNUF (@Computer Communications) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was -4.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.40%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +2.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.25%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Services to the Health Industry (-4.01% weekly)

This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.

@Computer Communications (+2.58% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SPNUF($1.56B) has a higher market cap than SMSZF($853M). SPNUF has higher P/E ratio than SMSZF: SPNUF (215.73) vs SMSZF (17.74). SMSZF (0.000) and SPNUF (0.000) have similar YTD gains . SMSZF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 13.3B vs. SPNUF (29.4M). SMSZF has more cash in the bank: 15B vs. SPNUF (157M). SPNUF has less debt than SMSZF: SPNUF (17.8M) vs SMSZF (8.71B). SMSZF has higher revenues than SPNUF: SMSZF (62.6B) vs SPNUF (471M).
SMSZFSPNUFSMSZF / SPNUF
Capitalization853M1.56B55%
EBITDA13.3B29.4M45,238%
Gain YTD0.0000.000-
P/E Ratio17.74215.738%
Revenue62.6B471M13,291%
Total Cash15B157M9,554%
Total Debt8.71B17.8M48,949%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SPNUF: Fundamental Ratings
SPNUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
88
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
55
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SMSZFSPNUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
2%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
31%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
2%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
31%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SSILX15.740.14
+0.90%
State Street International Stock Sel A
FMIMX35.620.26
+0.74%
FMI Common Stock Investor
CDGRX12.620.08
+0.64%
Copeland Dividend Growth Fund Class A
BGAKX13.420.05
+0.37%
Baillie Gifford Global Alpha Equities K
MFRJX57.100.18
+0.32%
MFS Research R4

SMSZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SMSZF and VQSSF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SMSZF and VQSSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMSZF
1D Price
Change %
SMSZF100%
N/A
VQSSF - SMSZF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SGGEF - SMSZF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SAPGF - SMSZF
2%
Poorly correlated
+2.40%
SMRT - SMSZF
1%
Poorly correlated
+2.47%
SPNUF - SMSZF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SPNUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPNUF has been loosely correlated with CVOSF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SPNUF jumps, then CVOSF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SPNUF
1D Price
Change %
SPNUF100%
N/A
CVOSF - SPNUF
55%
Loosely correlated
+3.23%
LIFX - SPNUF
48%
Loosely correlated
N/A
AISP - SPNUF
43%
Loosely correlated
-3.86%
ATEN - SPNUF
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.43%
DAVE - SPNUF
35%
Loosely correlated
+6.74%
More