SMSI
Price
$0.73
Change
+$0.02 (+2.82%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
15.74M
WTCHF
Price
$54.37
Change
-$4.91 (-8.28%)
Updated
Oct 14 closing price
Capitalization
17.98B
Interact to see
Advertisement

SMSI vs WTCHF

Header iconSMSI vs WTCHF Comparison
Open Charts SMSI vs WTCHFBanner chart's image
Smith Micro Software
Price$0.73
Change+$0.02 (+2.82%)
Volume$395.36K
Capitalization15.74M
Wisetech Global
Price$54.37
Change-$4.91 (-8.28%)
Volume$2.6K
Capitalization17.98B
SMSI vs WTCHF Comparison Chart in %
SMSI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WTCHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SMSI vs. WTCHF commentary
Oct 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMSI is a Hold and WTCHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2025
Stock price -- (SMSI: $0.73 vs. WTCHF: $54.37)
Brand notoriety: SMSI and WTCHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SMSI: 63% vs. WTCHF: 301%
Market capitalization -- SMSI: $15.74M vs. WTCHF: $17.98B
SMSI [@Packaged Software] is valued at $15.74M. WTCHF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $17.98B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $316.28B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SMSI’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWTCHF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SMSI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WTCHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SMSI is a better buy in the long-term than WTCHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SMSI’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WTCHF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SMSI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • WTCHF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WTCHF is a better buy in the short-term than SMSI.

Price Growth

SMSI (@Packaged Software) experienced а -5.39% price change this week, while WTCHF (@Packaged Software) price change was -8.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +84.04%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.64% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WTCHF($18B) has a higher market cap than SMSI($15.7M). WTCHF YTD gains are higher at: -34.078 vs. SMSI (-44.015). WTCHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 327M vs. SMSI (-15.83M). WTCHF has higher revenues than SMSI: WTCHF (736M) vs SMSI (18.7M).
SMSIWTCHFSMSI / WTCHF
Capitalization15.7M18B0%
EBITDA-15.83M327M-5%
Gain YTD-44.015-34.078129%
P/E RatioN/A90.62-
Revenue18.7M736M3%
Total Cash1.4MN/A-
Total Debt2.06MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SMSI vs WTCHF: Fundamental Ratings
SMSI
WTCHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3190
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
58
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10056
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9777
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
485
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WTCHF's Valuation (58) in the null industry is in the same range as SMSI (63) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that WTCHF’s stock grew similarly to SMSI’s over the last 12 months.

WTCHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMSI (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that WTCHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMSI’s over the last 12 months.

WTCHF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SMSI (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that WTCHF’s stock grew similarly to SMSI’s over the last 12 months.

WTCHF's Price Growth Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as SMSI (97) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that WTCHF’s stock grew similarly to SMSI’s over the last 12 months.

SMSI's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Packaged Software industry is significantly better than the same rating for WTCHF (85) in the null industry. This means that SMSI’s stock grew significantly faster than WTCHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SMSIWTCHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
30%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
84%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SMSI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WTCHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SHMD4.160.53
+14.60%
SCHMID GROUP N.V.
NTR57.421.00
+1.77%
Nutrien Ltd
AMS2.290.02
+0.88%
American Shared Hospital Services
ALHC17.120.13
+0.77%
Alignment Healthcare
NOAH11.32-0.03
-0.26%
Noah Holdings Limited

SMSI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMSI has been closely correlated with NUTX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMSI jumps, then NUTX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMSI
1D Price
Change %
SMSI100%
+3.30%
NUTX - SMSI
87%
Closely correlated
-1.93%
COIN - SMSI
49%
Loosely correlated
+1.75%
CLSK - SMSI
35%
Loosely correlated
-2.33%
RIOT - SMSI
33%
Loosely correlated
+2.46%
XBP - SMSI
33%
Poorly correlated
-0.55%
More

WTCHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WTCHF and WEX have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WTCHF and WEX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WTCHF
1D Price
Change %
WTCHF100%
N/A
WEX - WTCHF
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.94%
SMSI - WTCHF
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.30%
PUBM - WTCHF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.12%
SNAL - WTCHF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.94%
AICOF - WTCHF
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.17%
More