Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SMRPX vs TMLAX
SMRPX vs TMLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SMRPX vs. TMLAX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMRPX is a Hold and TMLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMRPX has more cash in the bank: 1.31B vs. TMLAX (137M). SMRPX pays higher dividends than TMLAX: SMRPX (4.22) vs TMLAX (3.80). SMRPX was incepted earlier than TMLAX: SMRPX (10 years) vs TMLAX (13 years). TMLAX (1.56) is less costly to investors than SMRPX (1.05). TMLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. SMRPX (52.00). TMLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMRPX: TMLAX (1000) vs SMRPX (1000000). SMRPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.66 vs. TMLAX (6.57). SMRPX return over 5 years is better than : 135.35 vs. TMLAX (91.98).
| SMRPX | TMLAX | SMRPX / TMLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.56 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.56 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.317 | 8.229 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.31B | 137M | 958% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.22 | 3.80 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.66 | 6.57 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.88 | 58.72 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 135.35 | 91.98 | 147% |
| Returns for 10 years | 213.70 | 120.84 | 177% |