Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SMRPX vs TMLAX
SMRPX vs TMLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SMRPX vs. TMLAX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMRPX is a Hold and TMLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMRPX has more cash in the bank: 1.24B vs. TMLAX (127M). SMRPX pays higher dividends than TMLAX: SMRPX (4.54) vs TMLAX (4.08). SMRPX was incepted earlier than TMLAX: SMRPX (10 years) vs TMLAX (13 years). TMLAX (1.56) is less costly to investors than SMRPX (1.05). SMRPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. TMLAX (55.00). TMLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMRPX: TMLAX (1000) vs SMRPX (1000000). TMLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.06 vs. SMRPX (-0.37). SMRPX return over 5 years is better than : 114.75 vs. TMLAX (76.29).
| SMRPX | TMLAX | SMRPX / TMLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.56 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.56 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.451 | 1.714 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.24B | 127M | 973% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.54 | 4.08 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.37 | -0.06 | 585% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.17 | 46.83 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 114.75 | 76.29 | 150% |
| Returns for 10 years | 208.27 | 118.85 | 175% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement