Advertisement
SMNUF vs TELDF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMNUF is a Hold and TELDF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SMNUF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTELDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- SMNUF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- TELDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SMNUF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TELDF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- SMNUF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
- TELDF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 1 bearish.
Price Growth
SMNUF (@Real Estate Development) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TELDF (@Major Telecommunications) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -0.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.27%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was -0.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.84%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Real Estate Development (-0.71% weekly)Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.
@Major Telecommunications (-0.46% weekly)Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.
| SMNUF | TELDF | SMNUF / TELDF | |
| Capitalization | 1.9B | 7.11B | 27% |
| EBITDA | 6.68T | 2.72B | 245,338% |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | -2.128 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 7.57 | 18.01 | 42% |
| Revenue | 12.97T | 8.49B | 152,767% |
| Total Cash | 968B | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 45.27T | N/A | - |
SMNUF | TELDF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 97 | 96 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 21 Undervalued | 12 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 18 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 89 | 84 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TELDF's Valuation (12) in the null industry is in the same range as SMNUF (21). This means that TELDF’s stock grew similarly to SMNUF’s over the last 12 months.
TELDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SMNUF (100). This means that TELDF’s stock grew similarly to SMNUF’s over the last 12 months.
SMNUF's SMR Rating (18) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TELDF (95). This means that SMNUF’s stock grew significantly faster than TELDF’s over the last 12 months.
TELDF's Price Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as SMNUF (64). This means that TELDF’s stock grew similarly to SMNUF’s over the last 12 months.
TELDF's P/E Growth Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as SMNUF (89). This means that TELDF’s stock grew similarly to SMNUF’s over the last 12 months.
| SMNUF | TELDF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 42% | 2 days ago 38% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 39% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 37% | 2 days ago 30% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 44% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 35% | 2 days ago 32% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 40% | 2 days ago 29% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 42% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PCAQX | 86.17 | 0.11 | +0.13% |
| Principal Capital Appreciation R5 | |||
| DRTCX | 20.05 | N/A | N/A |
| BNY Mellon Sust US Equity I | |||
| GFFFX | 81.37 | N/A | N/A |
| American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2 | |||
| RYVYX | 677.53 | -1.52 | -0.22% |
| Rydex NASDAQ-100® 2x Strategy H | |||
| GPGCX | 17.39 | -0.06 | -0.34% |
| Grandeur Peak Global Contrarian Instl | |||
SMNUF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMNUF has been loosely correlated with TCMFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMNUF jumps, then TCMFF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMNUF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMNUF | 100% | N/A | ||
| TCMFF - SMNUF | 40% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| TELDF - SMNUF | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| VZ - SMNUF | 23% Poorly correlated | -1.14% | ||
| QBCRF - SMNUF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SRHBY - SMNUF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
TELDF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that TELDF and FRTAY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TELDF and FRTAY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TELDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TELDF | 100% | N/A | ||
| FRTAY - TELDF | 32% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SMNUF - TELDF | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TCMFF - TELDF | 15% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TIMB - TELDF | 13% Poorly correlated | -1.71% | ||
| IHS - TELDF | 4% Poorly correlated | +2.16% | ||
More | ||||