SMNUF
Price
$0.04
Change
+$0.01 (+33.33%)
Updated
Sep 18 closing price
Capitalization
2.09B
SWZCF
Price
$741.11
Change
+$3.77 (+0.51%)
Updated
Sep 12 closing price
Capitalization
37.58B
Interact to see
Advertisement

SMNUF vs SWZCF

Header iconSMNUF vs SWZCF Comparison
Open Charts SMNUF vs SWZCFBanner chart's image
Pt Sarana Menara Nusantara, Tbk
Price$0.04
Change+$0.01 (+33.33%)
Volume$10K
Capitalization2.09B
Swisscom AG
Price$741.11
Change+$3.77 (+0.51%)
Volume$4
Capitalization37.58B
SMNUF vs SWZCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SMNUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SWZCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SMNUF vs. SWZCF commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMNUF is a Hold and SWZCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (SMNUF: $0.04 vs. SWZCF: $741.11)
Brand notoriety: SMNUF and SWZCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SMNUF: 208% vs. SWZCF: 10%
Market capitalization -- SMNUF: $2.09B vs. SWZCF: $37.58B
SMNUF [@Major Telecommunications] is valued at $2.09B. SWZCF’s [@Major Telecommunications] market capitalization is $37.58B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Telecommunications] industry ranges from $267.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Telecommunications] industry is $19.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SMNUF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSWZCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SMNUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SWZCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both SMNUF and SWZCF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SMNUF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SWZCF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SMNUF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SWZCF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both SMNUF and SWZCF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

SMNUF (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SWZCF (@Major Telecommunications) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +0.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +41.70%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Telecommunications (+0.03% weekly)

Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SWZCF($37.6B) has a higher market cap than SMNUF($2.09B). SWZCF has higher P/E ratio than SMNUF: SWZCF (22.91) vs SMNUF (9.33). SWZCF YTD gains are higher at: 33.293 vs. SMNUF (-18.715). SMNUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.69T vs. SWZCF (5.27B). SMNUF has more cash in the bank: 824B vs. SWZCF (200M). SWZCF has less debt than SMNUF: SWZCF (3.73B) vs SMNUF (50.78T). SMNUF has higher revenues than SWZCF: SMNUF (12.98T) vs SWZCF (13B).
SMNUFSWZCFSMNUF / SWZCF
Capitalization2.09B37.6B6%
EBITDA6.69T5.27B126,990%
Gain YTD-18.71533.293-56%
P/E Ratio9.3322.9141%
Revenue12.98T13B99,815%
Total Cash824B200M412,000%
Total Debt50.78T3.73B1,359,963%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SMNUF vs SWZCF: Fundamental Ratings
SMNUF
SWZCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10046
SMR RATING
1..100
1865
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3849
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3818
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6555

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SMNUF's Valuation (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SWZCF (98). This means that SMNUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SWZCF’s over the last 12 months.

SWZCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMNUF (100). This means that SWZCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMNUF’s over the last 12 months.

SMNUF's SMR Rating (18) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SWZCF (65). This means that SMNUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SWZCF’s over the last 12 months.

SMNUF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as SWZCF (49). This means that SMNUF’s stock grew similarly to SWZCF’s over the last 12 months.

SWZCF's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the null industry is in the same range as SMNUF (38). This means that SWZCF’s stock grew similarly to SMNUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SMNUFSWZCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
30%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
37%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
22%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SMNUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SWZCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GYRO10.710.84
+8.51%
Gyrodyne LLC
TNGX8.530.56
+7.03%
Tango Therapeutics
CABA2.360.05
+2.16%
Cabaletta Bio
WPM109.041.69
+1.57%
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp
BGC9.47-0.12
-1.25%
BGC Group

SMNUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMNUF has been loosely correlated with TCMFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMNUF jumps, then TCMFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMNUF
1D Price
Change %
SMNUF100%
N/A
TCMFF - SMNUF
41%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SFTBF - SMNUF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SFTBY - SMNUF
10%
Poorly correlated
-2.73%
SWZCF - SMNUF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QBCRF - SMNUF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SWZCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SWZCF has been loosely correlated with SCMWY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SWZCF jumps, then SCMWY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SWZCF
1D Price
Change %
SWZCF100%
N/A
SCMWY - SWZCF
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.03%
SMNUF - SWZCF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TIAIY - SWZCF
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.81%
TEFOF - SWZCF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SNGNF - SWZCF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More