It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SMMNY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSONVF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SMMNY’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SONVF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
SMMNY (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а +1.59% price change this week, while SONVF (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was +2.44% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was +7.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.22%.
SMMNY is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.
The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
SMMNY | SONVF | SMMNY / SONVF | |
Capitalization | 61.4B | 16.7B | 368% |
EBITDA | 4.68B | 927M | 505% |
Gain YTD | 6.284 | -13.327 | -47% |
P/E Ratio | 24.32 | 24.85 | 98% |
Revenue | 23.4B | 3.87B | 605% |
Total Cash | 2.77B | 687M | 404% |
Total Debt | 735M | 1.76B | 42% |
SMMNY | SONVF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 39 | 12 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 17 Undervalued | 17 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 79 | 75 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 62 | 48 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 79 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 78 | 68 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SMMNY's Valuation (17) in the null industry is in the same range as SONVF (17). This means that SMMNY’s stock grew similarly to SONVF’s over the last 12 months.
SONVF's Profit vs Risk Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as SMMNY (79). This means that SONVF’s stock grew similarly to SMMNY’s over the last 12 months.
SONVF's SMR Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as SMMNY (62). This means that SONVF’s stock grew similarly to SMMNY’s over the last 12 months.
SMMNY's Price Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as SONVF (79). This means that SMMNY’s stock grew similarly to SONVF’s over the last 12 months.
SONVF's P/E Growth Rating (68) in the null industry is in the same range as SMMNY (78). This means that SONVF’s stock grew similarly to SMMNY’s over the last 12 months.
SMMNY | SONVF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago66% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago55% | 4 days ago51% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago55% | 4 days ago59% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago68% | 4 days ago61% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago56% | 4 days ago63% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago54% | 4 days ago55% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago58% | 21 days ago68% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago69% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago55% | 4 days ago54% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMMNY has been loosely correlated with SAUHY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMMNY jumps, then SAUHY could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMMNY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SMMNY | 100% | +0.81% | ||
SAUHY - SMMNY | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.70% | ||
ESLOY - SMMNY | 41% Loosely correlated | +1.92% | ||
CLPBY - SMMNY | 35% Loosely correlated | +1.28% | ||
ESLOF - SMMNY | 33% Poorly correlated | +1.99% | ||
ATEC - SMMNY | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that SONVF and STSS have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SONVF and STSS's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SONVF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SONVF | 100% | +0.20% | ||
STSS - SONVF | 21% Poorly correlated | -2.54% | ||
HSDT - SONVF | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.83% | ||
SAUHY - SONVF | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.70% | ||
SONVY - SONVF | 15% Poorly correlated | +0.21% | ||
SMMNY - SONVF | 12% Poorly correlated | +0.81% | ||
More |