Ad is loading...
SMMD vs VB
SMMD vs VB Comparison
Open Charts SMMD vs VB
iShares Russell 2500 ETF
Price$65.86
Change+$0.18 (+0.27%)
Volume$533
Net Assets1.47B
Vanguard Small-Cap ETF
Price$232.17
Change+$0.48 (+0.21%)
Volume$12.81K
Net Assets139.54B
SMMD vs VB Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SMMD vs. VB commentary
May 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMMD is a Buy and VB is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VB has more net assets: 140B vs. SMMD (1.47B). SMMD has a higher annual dividend yield than VB: SMMD (-3.122) vs VB (-3.484). SMMD was incepted earlier than VB: SMMD (8 years) vs VB (21 years). VB (0.05) has a lower expense ratio than SMMD (0.15). VB has a higher turnover SMMD (9.00) vs SMMD (9.00).
| SMMD | VB | SMMD / VB | |
| Gain YTD | -3.122 | -3.484 | 90% |
| Net Assets | 1.47B | 140B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.05 | 300% |
| Turnover | 9.00 | 13.00 | 69% |
| Yield | 1.45 | 1.56 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 21 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SMMD | VB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 84% | 10 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
SMMD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMMD has been loosely correlated with PHM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMMD jumps, then PHM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMMD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMMD | 100% | -0.48% | ||
| PHM - SMMD | 61% Loosely correlated | -4.12% | ||
| BLDR - SMMD | 61% Loosely correlated | -3.47% | ||
| PTC - SMMD | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.30% | ||
| ENTG - SMMD | 53% Loosely correlated | -1.64% | ||
| HUBB - SMMD | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.25% | ||
More | ||||
VB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VB has been loosely correlated with BLDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VB jumps, then BLDR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y