Advertisement
SMLV vs STBA
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMLV is a Hold and STBA is a Hold.
STBA | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 52 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 30 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 29 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 20 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| SMLV | STBA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 57% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | 5 days ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 57% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MGLAX | 16.35 | 0.06 | +0.37% |
| MFS Global Real Estate A | |||
| HNIDX | 14.85 | 0.02 | +0.13% |
| Harbor Diversified Intl All Cp Retire | |||
| LGCOX | 19.70 | 0.01 | +0.05% |
| Lord Abbett Global Equity F3 | |||
| JDEUX | 47.49 | -0.11 | -0.23% |
| JPMorgan US Research Enhanced Equity R6 | |||
| MMYAX | 8.59 | -0.08 | -0.92% |
| MassMutual Small Company Value A | |||
SMLV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMLV has been closely correlated with TRMK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMLV jumps, then TRMK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMLV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMLV | 100% | +2.30% | ||
| TRMK - SMLV | 88% Closely correlated | -1.15% | ||
| ONB - SMLV | 88% Closely correlated | -1.30% | ||
| FULT - SMLV | 88% Closely correlated | -1.44% | ||
| STBA - SMLV | 87% Closely correlated | -2.29% | ||
| BRKL - SMLV | 87% Closely correlated | -1.77% | ||
More | ||||
STBA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STBA has been closely correlated with FMBH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if STBA jumps, then FMBH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To STBA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| STBA | 100% | -2.29% | ||
| FMBH - STBA | 92% Closely correlated | -2.82% | ||
| WSFS - STBA | 91% Closely correlated | -1.48% | ||
| FCF - STBA | 91% Closely correlated | -1.65% | ||
| UBSI - STBA | 91% Closely correlated | -2.23% | ||
| UCB - STBA | 91% Closely correlated | -1.11% | ||
More | ||||