SMLR
Price
$32.35
Change
+$1.35 (+4.35%)
Updated
Apr 17, 04:40 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
203.76M
26 days until earnings call
XGN
Price
$4.47
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Apr 17, 04:20 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
27.06M
32 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

SMLR vs XGN

Header iconSMLR vs XGN Comparison
Open Charts SMLR vs XGNBanner chart's image
Semler Scientific
Price$32.35
Change+$1.35 (+4.35%)
Volume$200
Capitalization203.76M
Exagen
Price$4.47
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization27.06M
SMLR vs XGN Comparison Chart
Loading...
SMLR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
XGN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SMLR vs. XGN commentary
Apr 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMLR is a Hold and XGN is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 18, 2025
Stock price -- (SMLR: $31.00 vs. XGN: $4.47)
Brand notoriety: SMLR and XGN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical Specialties industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SMLR: 79% vs. XGN: 68%
Market capitalization -- SMLR: $203.76M vs. XGN: $27.06M
SMLR [@Medical Specialties] is valued at $203.76M. XGN’s [@Medical Specialties] market capitalization is $27.06M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical Specialties] industry ranges from $3.82T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical Specialties] industry is $8.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SMLR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileXGN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SMLR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • XGN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, XGN is a better buy in the long-term than SMLR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SMLR’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XGN’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SMLR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • XGN’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, XGN is a better buy in the short-term than SMLR.

Price Growth

SMLR (@Medical Specialties) experienced а -11.83% price change this week, while XGN (@Medical Specialties) price change was +11.75% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was +1.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

SMLR is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2025.

XGN is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical Specialties (+1.44% weekly)

Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMLR($204M) has a higher market cap than XGN($27.1M). XGN YTD gains are higher at: 9.024 vs. SMLR (-42.593). SMLR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 23.6M vs. XGN (-19.15M). SMLR has more cash in the bank: 57.2M vs. XGN (36.5M). SMLR has less debt than XGN: SMLR (160K) vs XGN (23.7M). SMLR has higher revenues than XGN: SMLR (68.2M) vs XGN (52.5M).
SMLRXGNSMLR / XGN
Capitalization204M27.1M753%
EBITDA23.6M-19.15M-123%
Gain YTD-42.5939.024-472%
P/E Ratio11.02N/A-
Revenue68.2M52.5M130%
Total Cash57.2M36.5M157%
Total Debt160K23.7M1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SMLR: Fundamental Ratings
SMLR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
14
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
37
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
52
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
86
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SMLRXGN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SMLR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
XGN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X84033.870000364.875000
+0.44%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME26.25-0.45
-1.69%
GameStop Corp
SPY525.66-11.95
-2.22%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
AAPL194.27-7.87
-3.89%
Apple
TSLA241.55-12.56
-4.94%
Tesla

SMLR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMLR has been loosely correlated with RDNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMLR jumps, then RDNT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMLR
1D Price
Change %
SMLR100%
-9.88%
RDNT - SMLR
45%
Loosely correlated
-4.82%
NNOX - SMLR
43%
Loosely correlated
-4.26%
TMCI - SMLR
39%
Loosely correlated
-1.51%
BFLY - SMLR
37%
Loosely correlated
-6.75%
TWST - SMLR
36%
Loosely correlated
-2.66%
More

XGN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that XGN and BLFS have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that XGN and BLFS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XGN
1D Price
Change %
XGN100%
+1.36%
BLFS - XGN
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.76%
RDNT - XGN
26%
Poorly correlated
-4.82%
KRMD - XGN
24%
Poorly correlated
-4.58%
MASS - XGN
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.80%
SMLR - XGN
23%
Poorly correlated
-9.88%
More