Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SMIZ vs VB
SMIZ vs VB Comparison
Open Charts SMIZ vs VB
Zacks Small/Mid Cap ETF
Price$36.81
Change-$0.05 (-0.14%)
Volume$6.69K
Net Assets152.86M
Vanguard Small-Cap ETF
Price$253.20
Change-$0.01 (-0.00%)
Volume$530.2K
Net Assets162.36B
SMIZ vs VB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SMIZ vs. VB commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMIZ is a Hold and VB is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VB has more net assets: 162B vs. SMIZ (153M). SMIZ has a higher annual dividend yield than VB: SMIZ (10.943) vs VB (5.627). SMIZ was incepted earlier than VB: SMIZ (2 years) vs VB (22 years). VB (0.05) has a lower expense ratio than SMIZ (0.55). SMIZ has a higher turnover VB (13.00) vs VB (13.00).
| SMIZ | VB | SMIZ / VB | |
| Gain YTD | 10.943 | 5.627 | 194% |
| Net Assets | 153M | 162B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.05 | 1,100% |
| Turnover | 103.00 | 13.00 | 792% |
| Yield | 0.40 | 1.34 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 22 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SMIZ | VB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| OMFL | 59.71 | 0.51 | +0.86% |
| Invesco Russell 1000® Dynamic Mltfct ETF | |||
| ILS | 20.21 | 0.04 | +0.19% |
| Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF | |||
| FLSA | 35.10 | 0.04 | +0.12% |
| Franklin FTSE Saudi Arabia ETF | |||
| GXUS | 53.32 | N/A | N/A |
| Goldman Sachs MarketBeta(R) Ttl IntEqETF | |||
| KCCA | 17.98 | -0.02 | -0.11% |
| KraneShares California Carbon Allw ETF | |||
SMIZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMIZ has been closely correlated with JHG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMIZ jumps, then JHG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMIZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMIZ | 100% | -0.14% | ||
| JHG - SMIZ | 84% Closely correlated | -1.04% | ||
| FLS - SMIZ | 83% Closely correlated | +0.24% | ||
| MC - SMIZ | 81% Closely correlated | +0.88% | ||
| KKR - SMIZ | 81% Closely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| SEIC - SMIZ | 79% Closely correlated | +0.35% | ||
More | ||||
VB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VB has been loosely correlated with BLDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VB jumps, then BLDR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y