SMID
Price
$41.80
Change
+$0.44 (+1.06%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
221.73M
USLM
Price
$123.06
Change
+$2.07 (+1.71%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
3.52B
53 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

SMID vs USLM

Header iconSMID vs USLM Comparison
Open Charts SMID vs USLMBanner chart's image
Smith-Midland
Price$41.80
Change+$0.44 (+1.06%)
Volume$6.07K
Capitalization221.73M
United States Lime & Minerals
Price$123.06
Change+$2.07 (+1.71%)
Volume$130.48K
Capitalization3.52B
SMID vs USLM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SMID
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
USLM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SMID vs. USLM commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMID is a Hold and USLM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (SMID: $41.80 vs. USLM: $123.06)
Brand notoriety: SMID and USLM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SMID: 58% vs. USLM: 96%
Market capitalization -- SMID: $221.73M vs. USLM: $3.52B
SMID [@Construction Materials] is valued at $221.73M. USLM’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $3.52B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $75.44B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $9.94B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SMID’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUSLM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SMID’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • USLM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, USLM is a better buy in the long-term than SMID.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SMID’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while USLM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SMID’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • USLM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, USLM is a better buy in the short-term than SMID.

Price Growth

SMID (@Construction Materials) experienced а -3.17% price change this week, while USLM (@Construction Materials) price change was -2.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.80%.

Reported Earning Dates

USLM is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (-0.34% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
USLM($3.52B) has a higher market cap than SMID($222M). USLM has higher P/E ratio than SMID: USLM (28.22) vs SMID (18.41). SMID YTD gains are higher at: -5.983 vs. USLM (-7.135). USLM has less debt than SMID: USLM (4.48M) vs SMID (4.86M).
SMIDUSLMSMID / USLM
Capitalization222M3.52B6%
EBITDA18.4MN/A-
Gain YTD-5.983-7.13584%
P/E Ratio18.4128.2265%
Revenue91MN/A-
Total Cash7.1MN/A-
Total Debt4.86M4.48M109%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SMID vs USLM: Fundamental Ratings
SMID
USLM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8278
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4331
SMR RATING
1..100
3438
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4141
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9335
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SMID's Valuation (72) in the null industry is in the same range as USLM (80) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that SMID’s stock grew similarly to USLM’s over the last 12 months.

USLM's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as SMID (43) in the null industry. This means that USLM’s stock grew similarly to SMID’s over the last 12 months.

SMID's SMR Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as USLM (38) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that SMID’s stock grew similarly to USLM’s over the last 12 months.

SMID's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as USLM (41) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that SMID’s stock grew similarly to USLM’s over the last 12 months.

USLM's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMID (93) in the null industry. This means that USLM’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMID’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SMIDUSLM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SMID
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
USLM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DMZPY5.610.57
+11.20%
Domino's Pizza Australia New Zealand
AMKBF2174.20126.55
+6.18%
A.P. Moeller-Maersk A/S
AKAAF69.00N/A
N/A
Aker AS
BKUH0.02N/A
N/A
Bakhu Holdings, Corp.
IVCAF11.02N/A
N/A
Investcorp AI Acquisition Corp.

SMID and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMID has been loosely correlated with BCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMID jumps, then BCC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMID
1D Price
Change %
SMID100%
+1.06%
BCC - SMID
54%
Loosely correlated
+3.20%
USLM - SMID
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.71%
KNF - SMID
44%
Loosely correlated
+2.26%
EXP - SMID
44%
Loosely correlated
+4.14%
CRH - SMID
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.67%
More

USLM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, USLM has been loosely correlated with KNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if USLM jumps, then KNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To USLM
1D Price
Change %
USLM100%
+1.71%
KNF - USLM
56%
Loosely correlated
+2.26%
VMC - USLM
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.85%
BCC - USLM
52%
Loosely correlated
+3.20%
SMID - USLM
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.06%
EXP - USLM
45%
Loosely correlated
+4.14%
More