Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SMH vs XNTK
SMH vs XNTK Comparison
Open Charts SMH vs XNTK
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Price$364.44
Change+$5.01 (+1.39%)
Volume$55.19K
Net Assets35.52B
State Street® SPDR® NYSE Technology ETF
Price$282.21
Change+$2.25 (+0.80%)
Volume$68.74K
Net Assets1.46B
SMH vs XNTK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SMH vs. XNTK commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMH is a Hold and XNTK is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 35.5B vs. XNTK (1.46B). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than XNTK: SMH (48.491) vs XNTK (39.021). SMH was incepted earlier than XNTK: SMH (14 years) vs XNTK (25 years). SMH (0.35) and XNTK (0.35) have comparable expense ratios .
| SMH | XNTK | SMH / XNTK | |
| Gain YTD | 48.491 | 39.021 | 124% |
| Net Assets | 35.5B | 1.46B | 2,432% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.35 | 100% |
| Turnover | 15.00 | N/A | - |
| Yield | 0.30 | 0.24 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 25 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SMH | XNTK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 81% | 6 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 88% | 6 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 84% | 6 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 82% | 16 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | +1.88% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 87% Closely correlated | +2.82% | ||
| NVDA - SMH | 86% Closely correlated | +0.76% | ||
| TSM - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | +1.54% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 82% Closely correlated | +2.21% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 81% Closely correlated | +4.20% | ||
More | ||||
XNTK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XNTK has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XNTK jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XNTK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XNTK | 100% | +1.40% | ||
| LRCX - XNTK | 82% Closely correlated | +2.21% | ||
| NVDA - XNTK | 77% Closely correlated | +0.76% | ||
| ARM - XNTK | 76% Closely correlated | +1.14% | ||
| MU - XNTK | 76% Closely correlated | -0.40% | ||
| TSM - XNTK | 75% Closely correlated | +1.54% | ||
More | ||||