Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SMH vs WFH
SMH vs WFH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SMH vs. WFH commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMH is a Hold and WFH is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 37.6B vs. WFH (12.9M). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than WFH: SMH (46.810) vs WFH (15.471). SMH was incepted earlier than WFH: SMH (14 years) vs WFH (5 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than WFH (0.45).
| SMH | WFH | SMH / WFH | |
| Gain YTD | 46.810 | 15.471 | 303% |
| Net Assets | 37.6B | 12.9M | 291,473% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.45 | 78% |
| Turnover | 15.00 | N/A | - |
| Yield | 0.30 | 1.05 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SMH | WFH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 90% | 25 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 82% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CGBL | 35.04 | 0.09 | +0.26% |
| Capital Group Core Balanced ETF | |||
| CCNR | 32.50 | 0.05 | +0.16% |
| ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF | |||
| XTOC | 33.05 | 0.02 | +0.07% |
| Innovator US Equity Acclrtd Pls ETF™ Oct | |||
| ECOW | 25.57 | 0.01 | +0.03% |
| Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF | |||
| GRPM | 119.07 | -0.12 | -0.10% |
| Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF | |||
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | +1.28% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 87% Closely correlated | +0.68% | ||
| NVDA - SMH | 86% Closely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| TSM - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | -0.19% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 81% Closely correlated | +1.41% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 81% Closely correlated | +0.90% | ||
More | ||||
WFH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WFH has been loosely correlated with DOCN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WFH jumps, then DOCN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WFH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WFH | 100% | N/A | ||
| DOCN - WFH | 61% Loosely correlated | -3.26% | ||
| MNDY - WFH | 55% Loosely correlated | -3.67% | ||
| SOUN - WFH | 48% Loosely correlated | -1.49% | ||
| LAES - WFH | 26% Poorly correlated | -3.44% | ||
| FTNT - WFH | 10% Poorly correlated | -1.82% | ||
More | ||||