Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SMH vs TRFK
SMH vs TRFK Comparison
Open Charts SMH vs TRFK
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Price$364.44
Change+$5.01 (+1.39%)
Volume$55.19K
Net Assets35.52B
Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF
Price$67.05
Change+$0.33 (+0.49%)
Volume$473
Net Assets336.86M
SMH vs TRFK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SMH vs. TRFK commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMH is a Hold and TRFK is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 35.5B vs. TRFK (337M). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than TRFK: SMH (48.491) vs TRFK (32.244). SMH was incepted earlier than TRFK: SMH (14 years) vs TRFK (3 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than TRFK (0.49). TRFK has a higher turnover SMH (15.00) vs SMH (15.00).
| SMH | TRFK | SMH / TRFK | |
| Gain YTD | 48.491 | 32.244 | 150% |
| Net Assets | 35.5B | 337M | 10,534% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.49 | 71% |
| Turnover | 15.00 | 36.00 | 42% |
| Yield | 0.30 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SMH | TRFK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 87% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 81% | 6 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 88% | 6 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 84% | 6 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 82% | 13 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | +1.88% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 87% Closely correlated | +2.82% | ||
| NVDA - SMH | 86% Closely correlated | +0.76% | ||
| TSM - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | +1.54% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 82% Closely correlated | +2.21% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 81% Closely correlated | +4.20% | ||
More | ||||
TRFK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TRFK has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TRFK jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TRFK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRFK | 100% | +0.98% | ||
| NVDA - TRFK | 84% Closely correlated | +0.76% | ||
| AVGO - TRFK | 80% Closely correlated | -1.20% | ||
| MRVL - TRFK | 75% Closely correlated | +1.96% | ||
| NVT - TRFK | 74% Closely correlated | -0.31% | ||
| ANET - TRFK | 74% Closely correlated | -0.69% | ||
More | ||||