Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SMH vs TINY
SMH vs TINY Comparison
Open Charts SMH vs TINY
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Price$291.12
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$20.62K
Net Assets27.05B
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF
Price$44.63
Change-$0.82 (-1.80%)
Volume$1.26K
Net Assets4.45M
SMH vs TINY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SMH vs. TINY commentary
Aug 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMH is a Hold and TINY is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 27B vs. TINY (4.45M). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than TINY: SMH (20.213) vs TINY (-0.224). SMH was incepted earlier than TINY: SMH (14 years) vs TINY (4 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than TINY (0.58). TINY has a higher turnover SMH (15.00) vs SMH (15.00).
| SMH | TINY | SMH / TINY | |
| Gain YTD | 20.213 | -0.224 | -9,026% |
| Net Assets | 27B | 4.45M | 607,014% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.58 | 60% |
| Turnover | 15.00 | 42.00 | 36% |
| Yield | 0.37 | 0.06 | 659% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SMH | TINY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 84% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | N/A | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 89% Closely correlated | +2.62% | ||
| NVDA - SMH | 88% Closely correlated | +1.07% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 87% Closely correlated | +0.30% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 87% Closely correlated | +0.94% | ||
| TSM - SMH | 84% Closely correlated | -0.33% | ||
More | ||||
TINY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TINY has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TINY jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TINY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TINY | 100% | N/A | ||
| KLAC - TINY | 68% Closely correlated | +0.30% | ||
| LRCX - TINY | 67% Closely correlated | +2.62% | ||
| AMAT - TINY | 66% Closely correlated | +0.94% | ||
| UCTT - TINY | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.35% | ||
| ENTG - TINY | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.39% | ||
More | ||||