Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SMH vs TINY
SMH vs TINY Comparison
Open Charts SMH vs TINY
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Price$278.42
Change+$3.22 (+1.17%)
Volume$8.17M
Net Assets25.99B
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF
Price$43.83
Change-$0.24 (-0.54%)
Volume$293
Net Assets4.39M
SMH vs TINY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SMH vs. TINY commentary
Jun 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMH is a Buy and TINY is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 26B vs. TINY (4.4M). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than TINY: SMH (14.969) vs TINY (-1.993). SMH was incepted earlier than TINY: SMH (14 years) vs TINY (4 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than TINY (0.58). TINY has a higher turnover SMH (18.00) vs SMH (18.00).
| SMH | TINY | SMH / TINY | |
| Gain YTD | 14.969 | -1.993 | -751% |
| Net Assets | 26B | 4.4M | 591,581% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.58 | 60% |
| Turnover | 18.00 | 42.00 | 43% |
| Yield | 0.45 | 0.01 | 3,767% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SMH | TINY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | +1.17% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 88% Closely correlated | +0.40% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | -1.45% | ||
| ASML - SMH | 82% Closely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| AVGO - SMH | 82% Closely correlated | -0.30% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 82% Closely correlated | -0.17% | ||
More | ||||
TINY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TINY has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TINY jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TINY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TINY | 100% | -0.54% | ||
| KLAC - TINY | 75% Closely correlated | -1.45% | ||
| LRCX - TINY | 74% Closely correlated | +0.40% | ||
| AMAT - TINY | 73% Closely correlated | -0.17% | ||
| VECO - TINY | 73% Closely correlated | -3.30% | ||
| UCTT - TINY | 71% Closely correlated | +0.53% | ||
More | ||||