Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SMH vs TINY
SMH vs TINY Comparison
Open Charts SMH vs TINY
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Price$292.50
Change+$2.19 (+0.75%)
Volume$1.98K
Net Assets27.34B
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF
Price$45.56
Change+$0.09 (+0.20%)
Volume$900
Net Assets4.54M
SMH vs TINY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SMH vs. TINY commentary
Jul 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMH is a Hold and TINY is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 27.3B vs. TINY (4.54M). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than TINY: SMH (19.879) vs TINY (1.855). SMH was incepted earlier than TINY: SMH (14 years) vs TINY (4 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than TINY (0.58). TINY has a higher turnover SMH (15.00) vs SMH (15.00).
| SMH | TINY | SMH / TINY | |
| Gain YTD | 19.879 | 1.855 | 1,072% |
| Net Assets | 27.3B | 4.54M | 601,587% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.58 | 60% |
| Turnover | 15.00 | 42.00 | 36% |
| Yield | 0.38 | 0.06 | 686% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SMH | TINY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 89% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 84% | 22 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | -0.48% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 88% Closely correlated | +0.29% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | -0.64% | ||
| AVGO - SMH | 82% Closely correlated | -1.09% | ||
| ASML - SMH | 82% Closely correlated | -1.39% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 82% Closely correlated | -1.08% | ||
More | ||||
TINY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TINY has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TINY jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TINY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TINY | 100% | N/A | ||
| KLAC - TINY | 74% Closely correlated | -0.64% | ||
| LRCX - TINY | 73% Closely correlated | +0.29% | ||
| AMAT - TINY | 73% Closely correlated | -1.08% | ||
| VECO - TINY | 72% Closely correlated | -0.60% | ||
| UCTT - TINY | 70% Closely correlated | -4.16% | ||
More | ||||