Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SMH vs STK
SMH vs STK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SMH vs. STK commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMH is a Hold and STK is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 43.5B vs. STK (728M). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than STK: SMH (10.427) vs STK (9.622). SMH was incepted earlier than STK: SMH (14 years) vs STK (16 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than STK (1.26). STK has a higher turnover SMH (12.00) vs SMH (12.00).
| SMH | STK | SMH / STK | |
| Gain YTD | 10.427 | 9.622 | 108% |
| Net Assets | 43.5B | 728M | 5,975% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.26 | 28% |
| Turnover | 12.00 | 40.00 | 30% |
| Yield | 0.27 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 16 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SMH | STK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 7 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | 8 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 83% | 6 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| NFXS | 20.28 | 0.66 | +3.37% |
| Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares | |||
| SKF | 26.64 | 0.47 | +1.80% |
| ProShares UltraShort Financials | |||
| AFMC | 36.50 | 0.03 | +0.08% |
| First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF | |||
| EVTR | 51.46 | 0.02 | +0.04% |
| Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF | |||
| BRNY | 50.71 | -1.05 | -2.03% |
| Burney U.S. Factor Rotation ETF | |||
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | -2.52% | ||
| NVDA - SMH | 86% Closely correlated | -2.84% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 86% Closely correlated | -3.12% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 83% Closely correlated | -3.89% | ||
| TSM - SMH | 83% Closely correlated | -1.64% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 81% Closely correlated | -2.96% | ||
More | ||||
STK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that STK and LRCX have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that STK and LRCX's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To STK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| STK | 100% | -0.84% | ||
| LRCX - STK | 18% Poorly correlated | -3.12% | ||
| AMAT - STK | 17% Poorly correlated | -2.96% | ||
| TER - STK | 16% Poorly correlated | +13.41% | ||
| AAPL - STK | 15% Poorly correlated | -0.20% | ||
| MSFT - STK | 13% Poorly correlated | -2.87% | ||
More | ||||