Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SMH vs STK
SMH vs STK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SMH vs. STK commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMH is a Hold and STK is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 33.8B vs. STK (664M). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than STK: SMH (41.566) vs STK (19.940). SMH was incepted earlier than STK: SMH (14 years) vs STK (16 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than STK (1.26). STK has a higher turnover SMH (15.00) vs SMH (15.00).
| SMH | STK | SMH / STK | |
| Gain YTD | 41.566 | 19.940 | 208% |
| Net Assets | 33.8B | 664M | 5,090% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.26 | 28% |
| Turnover | 15.00 | 40.00 | 38% |
| Yield | 0.33 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 16 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SMH | STK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 83% | 9 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| JUST | 93.71 | 0.51 | +0.55% |
| Goldman Sachs JUST US Large Cap Eq ETF | |||
| DFVE | 31.04 | 0.08 | +0.27% |
| DoubleLine Fortune 500 Equal Weight ETF | |||
| PHD | 9.95 | N/A | N/A |
| Pioneer Floating Rate Fund | |||
| FPWR | 33.72 | -0.11 | -0.32% |
| First Trust EIP Power Solutions ETF | |||
| DISV | 35.64 | -0.16 | -0.45% |
| Dimensional International Sm Cp Val ETF | |||
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | -0.14% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 86% Closely correlated | -0.60% | ||
| NVDA - SMH | 86% Closely correlated | +0.78% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | +0.72% | ||
| TSM - SMH | 83% Closely correlated | -1.59% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 81% Closely correlated | -1.20% | ||
More | ||||
STK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that STK and LRCX have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that STK and LRCX's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To STK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| STK | 100% | -0.08% | ||
| LRCX - STK | 18% Poorly correlated | -0.60% | ||
| AMAT - STK | 17% Poorly correlated | -1.20% | ||
| TER - STK | 16% Poorly correlated | -0.82% | ||
| AAPL - STK | 15% Poorly correlated | +1.96% | ||
| MSFT - STK | 13% Poorly correlated | +0.39% | ||
More | ||||