Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SMH vs SPAM
SMH vs SPAM Comparison
Open Charts SMH vs SPAM
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Price$293.28
Change+$3.42 (+1.18%)
Volume$9.81M
Net Assets27.82B
Themes Cybersecurity ETF
Price$32.00
Change-$0.43 (-1.33%)
Volume$199
Net Assets1.94M
SMH vs SPAM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SMH vs. SPAM commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMH is a Hold and SPAM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 27.8B vs. SPAM (1.94M). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than SPAM: SMH (21.105) vs SPAM (8.949). SMH was incepted earlier than SPAM: SMH (14 years) vs SPAM (2 years). SMH (0.35) and SPAM (0.35) have comparable expense ratios . SPAM has a higher turnover SMH (15.00) vs SMH (15.00).
| SMH | SPAM | SMH / SPAM | |
| Gain YTD | 21.105 | 8.949 | 236% |
| Net Assets | 27.8B | 1.94M | 1,434,469% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.35 | 100% |
| Turnover | 15.00 | 24.00 | 63% |
| Yield | 0.37 | 0.11 | 322% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SMH | SPAM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 5 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 22 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 83% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 6 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | +1.18% | ||
| NVDA - SMH | 88% Closely correlated | -2.70% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 87% Closely correlated | +2.52% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | +3.64% | ||
| TSM - SMH | 84% Closely correlated | +3.49% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 83% Closely correlated | +2.85% | ||
More | ||||
SPAM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPAM has been closely correlated with PANW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SPAM jumps, then PANW could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPAM | 100% | N/A | ||
| PANW - SPAM | 72% Closely correlated | +1.10% | ||
| CRWD - SPAM | 70% Closely correlated | +1.25% | ||
| ZS - SPAM | 68% Closely correlated | +2.22% | ||
| ATEN - SPAM | 67% Closely correlated | -1.01% | ||
| S - SPAM | 66% Loosely correlated | +3.20% | ||
More | ||||