Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SMH vs SPAM
SMH vs SPAM Comparison
Open Charts SMH vs SPAM
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Price$286.56
Change+$1.19 (+0.42%)
Volume$37.23K
Net Assets27B
Themes Cybersecurity ETF
Price$32.83
Change+$0.23 (+0.71%)
Volume$1.27K
Net Assets1.96M
SMH vs SPAM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SMH vs. SPAM commentary
Jul 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMH is a Hold and SPAM is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 27B vs. SPAM (1.96M). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than SPAM: SMH (17.839) vs SPAM (10.992). SMH was incepted earlier than SPAM: SMH (14 years) vs SPAM (2 years). SMH (0.35) and SPAM (0.35) have comparable expense ratios . SPAM has a higher turnover SMH (15.00) vs SMH (15.00).
| SMH | SPAM | SMH / SPAM | |
| Gain YTD | 17.839 | 10.992 | 162% |
| Net Assets | 27B | 1.96M | 1,380,368% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.35 | 100% |
| Turnover | 15.00 | 24.00 | 63% |
| Yield | 0.38 | 0.11 | 342% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SMH | SPAM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 21 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 84% | 22 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | -1.77% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 88% Closely correlated | -3.98% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | -4.86% | ||
| AVGO - SMH | 82% Closely correlated | -3.34% | ||
| ASML - SMH | 82% Closely correlated | -1.97% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 82% Closely correlated | -2.84% | ||
More | ||||
SPAM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPAM has been closely correlated with PANW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SPAM jumps, then PANW could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPAM | 100% | -0.33% | ||
| PANW - SPAM | 73% Closely correlated | -1.58% | ||
| ZS - SPAM | 69% Closely correlated | -0.94% | ||
| CYBR - SPAM | 69% Closely correlated | -1.16% | ||
| S - SPAM | 67% Closely correlated | -2.68% | ||
| CRWD - SPAM | 65% Loosely correlated | -2.15% | ||
More | ||||