Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SMH vs SOXQ
SMH vs SOXQ Comparison
Open Charts SMH vs SOXQ
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Price$370.89
Change-$3.21 (-0.86%)
Volume$7.5M
Net Assets38.25B
Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF
Price$58.43
Change-$0.38 (-0.65%)
Volume$721.63K
Net Assets817.72M
SMH vs SOXQ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SMH vs. SOXQ commentary
Dec 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMH is a Hold and SOXQ is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 38.3B vs. SOXQ (818M). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than SOXQ: SMH (53.153) vs SOXQ (49.763). SMH was incepted earlier than SOXQ: SMH (14 years) vs SOXQ (5 years). SOXQ (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than SMH (0.35). SOXQ has a higher turnover SMH (15.00) vs SMH (15.00).
| SMH | SOXQ | SMH / SOXQ | |
| Gain YTD | 53.153 | 49.763 | 107% |
| Net Assets | 38.3B | 818M | 4,682% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.19 | 184% |
| Turnover | 15.00 | 22.00 | 68% |
| Yield | 0.30 | 0.52 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SMH | SOXQ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 25 days ago 82% | 25 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | -0.86% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 87% Closely correlated | +0.59% | ||
| NVDA - SMH | 86% Closely correlated | -1.55% | ||
| TSM - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | -1.71% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 82% Closely correlated | +0.27% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 81% Closely correlated | -1.83% | ||
More | ||||
SOXQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SOXQ has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SOXQ jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SOXQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOXQ | 100% | -0.65% | ||
| LRCX - SOXQ | 88% Closely correlated | +0.27% | ||
| KLAC - SOXQ | 87% Closely correlated | +0.59% | ||
| AMAT - SOXQ | 82% Closely correlated | -1.83% | ||
| TSM - SOXQ | 82% Closely correlated | -1.71% | ||
| MPWR - SOXQ | 81% Closely correlated | +0.25% | ||
More | ||||