Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SMFPX vs VLPAX
SMFPX vs VLPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SMFPX vs. VLPAX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMFPX is a Hold and VLPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.29B vs. VLPAX (42.6M). SMFPX pays higher dividends than VLPAX: SMFPX (3.19) vs VLPAX (1.78). SMFPX was incepted earlier than VLPAX: SMFPX (13 years) vs VLPAX (10 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than VLPAX (1.73). VLPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. SMFPX (52.00). SMFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than VLPAX: SMFPX (1000) vs VLPAX (2500). SMFPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.78 vs. VLPAX (-0.02). VLPAX return over 5 years is better than : 181.68 vs. SMFPX (123.81).
| SMFPX | VLPAX | SMFPX / VLPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 1.40 | 151% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 1.73 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.213 | 7.985 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.29B | 42.6M | 3,021% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.19 | 1.78 | 179% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.78 | -0.02 | -35,316% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.05 | 58.22 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 123.81 | 181.68 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 182.43 | 209.04 | 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement