Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SMFPX vs TORCX
SMFPX vs TORCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SMFPX vs. TORCX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMFPX is a Hold and TORCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TORCX has more cash in the bank: 3.46B vs. SMFPX (1.29B). TORCX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: TORCX (4.02) vs SMFPX (3.19). SMFPX was incepted earlier than TORCX: SMFPX (13 years) vs TORCX (13 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than TORCX (1.92). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. TORCX (22.00). SMFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than TORCX: SMFPX (1000) vs TORCX (2500). SMFPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.78 vs. TORCX (6.06). TORCX return over 5 years is better than : 165.23 vs. SMFPX (123.81).
| SMFPX | TORCX | SMFPX / TORCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 1.92 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 1.92 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.213 | 8.342 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.29B | 3.46B | 37% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.19 | 4.02 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.78 | 6.06 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.05 | 72.11 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 123.81 | 165.23 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 182.43 | 190.70 | 96% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers