Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SMFPX vs TORCX
SMFPX vs TORCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SMFPX vs. TORCX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMFPX is a Hold and TORCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TORCX has more cash in the bank: 3.25B vs. SMFPX (1.24B). TORCX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: TORCX (4.29) vs SMFPX (3.42). SMFPX was incepted earlier than TORCX: SMFPX (13 years) vs TORCX (13 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than TORCX (1.92). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. TORCX (22.00). SMFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than TORCX: SMFPX (1000) vs TORCX (2500). TORCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.46 vs. SMFPX (13.06). TORCX return over 5 years is better than : 189.81 vs. SMFPX (153.05).
| SMFPX | TORCX | SMFPX / TORCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 1.92 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 1.92 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.487 | 2.564 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.24B | 3.25B | 38% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.42 | 4.29 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.06 | 15.46 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.48 | 61.51 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 153.05 | 189.81 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.46 | 87.48 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement