Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SMFPX vs TMLPX
SMFPX vs TMLPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SMFPX vs. TMLPX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMFPX is a Hold and TMLPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.29B vs. TMLPX (137M). TMLPX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: TMLPX (4.03) vs SMFPX (3.19). SMFPX was incepted earlier than TMLPX: SMFPX (13 years) vs TMLPX (13 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than TMLPX (1.28). TMLPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. SMFPX (52.00). SMFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than TMLPX: SMFPX (1000) vs TMLPX (1000000). TMLPX (6.83) and SMFPX (6.78) have marching annual gain over last year. SMFPX return over 5 years is better than : 123.81 vs. TMLPX (94.08).
| SMFPX | TMLPX | SMFPX / TMLPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 1.28 | 166% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 1.28 | 168% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.213 | 8.238 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.29B | 137M | 939% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.19 | 4.03 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.78 | 6.83 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.05 | 60.07 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 123.81 | 94.08 | 132% |
| Returns for 10 years | 182.43 | 124.75 | 146% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement