Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SMFPX vs TMLAX
SMFPX vs TMLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SMFPX vs. TMLAX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMFPX is a Hold and TMLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.29B vs. TMLAX (137M). TMLAX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: TMLAX (3.80) vs SMFPX (3.19). SMFPX was incepted earlier than TMLAX: SMFPX (13 years) vs TMLAX (13 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than TMLAX (1.56). TMLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. SMFPX (52.00). SMFPX (1000) and TMLAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SMFPX (6.78) and TMLAX (6.57) have marching annual gain over last year. SMFPX return over 5 years is better than : 123.81 vs. TMLAX (91.98).
| SMFPX | TMLAX | SMFPX / TMLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 1.56 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 1.56 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.213 | 8.229 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.29B | 137M | 939% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.19 | 3.80 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.78 | 6.57 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.05 | 58.72 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 123.81 | 91.98 | 135% |
| Returns for 10 years | 182.43 | 120.84 | 151% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers