Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SMFPX vs TMLAX
SMFPX vs TMLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SMFPX vs. TMLAX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMFPX is a Hold and TMLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.22B vs. TMLAX (122M). TMLAX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: TMLAX (3.89) vs SMFPX (3.37). SMFPX was incepted earlier than TMLAX: SMFPX (13 years) vs TMLAX (12 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than TMLAX (1.56). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. TMLAX (55.00). SMFPX (1000) and TMLAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TMLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.35 vs. SMFPX (5.68). SMFPX return over 5 years is better than : 160.73 vs. TMLAX (110.56).
| SMFPX | TMLAX | SMFPX / TMLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 1.56 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 1.56 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.691 | 0.591 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.22B | 122M | 997% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.37 | 3.89 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.68 | 7.35 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.42 | 46.16 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 160.73 | 110.56 | 145% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.91 | 39.70 | 143% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers