Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SMFPX vs TMLAX
SMFPX vs TMLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SMFPX vs. TMLAX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMFPX is a Hold and TMLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.24B vs. TMLAX (127M). TMLAX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: TMLAX (4.08) vs SMFPX (3.43). SMFPX was incepted earlier than TMLAX: SMFPX (13 years) vs TMLAX (13 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than TMLAX (1.56). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. TMLAX (55.00). SMFPX (1000) and TMLAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TMLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.06 vs. SMFPX (-1.18). SMFPX return over 5 years is better than : 104.08 vs. TMLAX (76.29).
| SMFPX | TMLAX | SMFPX / TMLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 1.56 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 1.56 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.449 | 1.714 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.24B | 127M | 973% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.43 | 4.08 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.18 | -0.06 | 1,873% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.64 | 46.83 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 104.08 | 76.29 | 136% |
| Returns for 10 years | 177.89 | 118.85 | 150% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement