SMFG vs WFC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMFG is a Buy and WFC is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SMFG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWFC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- SMFG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- WFC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SMFG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WFC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- SMFG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- WFC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
SMFG (@Major Banks) experienced а +6.56% price change this week, while WFC (@Major Banks) price change was +8.47% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +2.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +72.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.40%.
Reported Earning Dates
SMFG is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.
WFC is expected to report earnings on Jul 15, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Major Banks (+2.65% weekly)Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.
| SMFG | WFC | SMFG / WFC | |
| Capitalization | 74.8B | 204B | 37% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.484 | -0.665 | 374% |
| P/E Ratio | 13.83 | 11.93 | 116% |
| Revenue | 3.98T | 82.6B | 4,823% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 33B | - |
| Total Debt | 32.98T | 219B | 15,058% |
SMFG | WFC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 24 | 19 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 42 Fair valued | 82 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 13 | 13 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 1 | 2 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 80 | 46 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SMFG's Valuation (42) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WFC (82). This means that SMFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than WFC’s over the last 12 months.
SMFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as WFC (13). This means that SMFG’s stock grew similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.
SMFG's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as WFC (2). This means that SMFG’s stock grew similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.
WFC's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SMFG (55). This means that WFC’s stock grew similarly to SMFG’s over the last 12 months.
WFC's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMFG (80). This means that WFC’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMFG’s over the last 12 months.
| SMFG | WFC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 44% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 5 days ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 47% | 19 days ago 58% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 69% |
SMFG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMFG has been closely correlated with MUFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMFG jumps, then MUFG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMFG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMFG | 100% | +1.73% | ||
| MUFG - SMFG | 91% Closely correlated | +2.61% | ||
| C - SMFG | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.22% | ||
| BAC - SMFG | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.23% | ||
| HSBC - SMFG | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.63% | ||
| WFC - SMFG | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.43% | ||
More | ||||
WFC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WFC has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WFC jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.