SMFG
Price
$14.07
Change
-$0.10 (-0.71%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
38 days until earnings call
UBS
Price
$29.78
Change
-$0.03 (-0.10%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
43 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

SMFG vs UBS

Header iconSMFG vs UBS Comparison
Open Charts SMFG vs UBSBanner chart's image
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group
Price$14.07
Change-$0.10 (-0.71%)
Volume$1.73M
CapitalizationN/A
UBS Group AG
Price$29.78
Change-$0.03 (-0.10%)
Volume$2.3M
CapitalizationN/A
SMFG vs UBS Comparison Chart
Loading...
SMFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SMFG vs. UBS commentary
Dec 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMFG is a Hold and UBS is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 23, 2024
Stock price -- (SMFG: $14.07 vs. UBS: $29.78)
Brand notoriety: SMFG and UBS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SMFG: 185% vs. UBS: 168%
Market capitalization -- SMFG: $74.81B vs. UBS: $98.65B
SMFG [@Major Banks] is valued at $74.81B. UBS’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $98.65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SMFG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUBS’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • SMFG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • UBS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SMFG is a better buy in the long-term than UBS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SMFG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UBS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SMFG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • UBS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SMFG is a better buy in the short-term than UBS.

Price Growth

SMFG (@Major Banks) experienced а -5.51% price change this week, while UBS (@Major Banks) price change was -6.53% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -1.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.83%.

Reported Earning Dates

SMFG is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.

UBS is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (-1.31% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UBS($98.7B) has a higher market cap than SMFG($74.8B). SMFG has higher P/E ratio than UBS: SMFG (13.83) vs UBS (3.61). SMFG YTD gains are higher at: 47.436 vs. UBS (-1.088). UBS has less debt than SMFG: UBS (378B) vs SMFG (32.98T). SMFG has higher revenues than UBS: SMFG (3.98T) vs UBS (39.4B).
SMFGUBSSMFG / UBS
Capitalization74.8B98.7B76%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD47.436-1.088-4,361%
P/E Ratio13.833.61383%
Revenue3.98T39.4B10,112%
Total CashN/A144B-
Total Debt32.98T378B8,724%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SMFG vs UBS: Fundamental Ratings
SMFG
UBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5597
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
49
Fair valued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
86
SMR RATING
1..100
15
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4371
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
542
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SMFG's Valuation (49) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as UBS (50). This means that SMFG’s stock grew similarly to UBS’s over the last 12 months.

UBS's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SMFG (8). This means that UBS’s stock grew similarly to SMFG’s over the last 12 months.

SMFG's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as UBS (5). This means that SMFG’s stock grew similarly to UBS’s over the last 12 months.

SMFG's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as UBS (71). This means that SMFG’s stock grew similarly to UBS’s over the last 12 months.

UBS's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMFG (54). This means that UBS’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SMFGUBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SMFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME29.820.82
+2.83%
GameStop Corp
AAPL254.494.70
+1.88%
Apple
SPY591.157.02
+1.20%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X95104.940000-2119.789000
-2.18%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA421.06-15.11
-3.46%
Tesla

SMFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMFG has been closely correlated with MUFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMFG jumps, then MUFG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMFG
1D Price
Change %
SMFG100%
-0.71%
MUFG - SMFG
88%
Closely correlated
-1.04%
UBS - SMFG
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.10%
CMWAY - SMFG
35%
Loosely correlated
-2.29%
C - SMFG
33%
Poorly correlated
+1.13%
BNS - SMFG
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.36%
More

UBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UBS has been loosely correlated with RY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UBS jumps, then RY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UBS
1D Price
Change %
UBS100%
-0.10%
RY - UBS
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.84%
MUFG - UBS
37%
Loosely correlated
-1.04%
BMO - UBS
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.08%
SMFG - UBS
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.71%
BNS - UBS
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.36%
More