Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SMDVX vs VIMSX
SMDVX vs VIMSX Comparison
Open Charts SMDVX vs VIMSX
Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opps A
Price$18.36
Change+$0.11 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets989.08M
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Investor
Price$77.52
Change+$0.46 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets185.28B
SMDVX vs VIMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SMDVX vs. VIMSX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMDVX is a StrongBuy and VIMSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMSX has more cash in the bank: 185B vs. SMDVX (989M). VIMSX pays higher dividends than SMDVX: VIMSX (1.40) vs SMDVX (0.16). SMDVX was incepted earlier than VIMSX: SMDVX (19 years) vs VIMSX (27 years). SMDVX (1.16) is less costly to investors than VIMSX (0.17). SMDVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. VIMSX (16.00). SMDVX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIMSX: SMDVX (2000) vs VIMSX (3000). VIMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.63 vs. SMDVX (1.61). VIMSX return over 5 years is better than : 73.64 vs. SMDVX (34.35).
| SMDVX | VIMSX | SMDVX / VIMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.17 | 682% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.17 | 682% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | 7.625 | - |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 3000 | 67% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 989M | 185B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 1.40 | 11% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.61 | 17.63 | 9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.05 | 43.06 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.35 | 73.64 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.82 | 127.44 | 36% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement