Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SMCO vs VXF
SMCO vs VXF Comparison
Open Charts SMCO vs VXF
Hilton Small-MidCap Opportunity ETF
Price$26.29
Change-$0.60 (-2.23%)
Volume$3.26K
Net Assets128.11M
Vanguard Extended Market ETF
Price$204.47
Change-$5.63 (-2.68%)
Volume$418.55K
Net Assets83.92B
SMCO vs VXF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SMCO vs. VXF commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMCO is a Buy and VXF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VXF has more net assets: 83.9B vs. SMCO (128M). VXF has a higher annual dividend yield than SMCO: VXF (10.828) vs SMCO (5.744). SMCO was incepted earlier than VXF: SMCO (2 years) vs VXF (24 years). VXF (0.05) has a lower expense ratio than SMCO (0.55). SMCO has a higher turnover VXF (11.00) vs VXF (11.00).
| SMCO | VXF | SMCO / VXF | |
| Gain YTD | 5.744 | 10.828 | 53% |
| Net Assets | 128M | 83.9B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.05 | 1,100% |
| Turnover | 15.00 | 11.00 | 136% |
| Yield | 0.44 | 1.09 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 24 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SMCO | VXF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
SMCO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SMCO and J have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SMCO and J's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMCO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMCO | 100% | -0.05% | ||
| J - SMCO | 18% Poorly correlated | -0.03% | ||
| JKHY - SMCO | 18% Poorly correlated | +0.87% | ||
| BR - SMCO | 18% Poorly correlated | +0.35% | ||
| IRT - SMCO | 15% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| IDA - SMCO | 14% Poorly correlated | +1.49% | ||
More | ||||
VXF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VXF has been closely correlated with APO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VXF jumps, then APO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VXF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VXF | 100% | -0.01% | ||
| APO - VXF | 72% Closely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| KKR - VXF | 71% Closely correlated | +1.41% | ||
| FERG - VXF | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.39% | ||
| XYZ - VXF | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.21% | ||
| MRVL - VXF | 55% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||