SMC
Price
$20.86
Change
+$0.77 (+3.83%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
255.37M
TRGP
Price
$163.19
Change
-$2.32 (-1.40%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
35.12B
73 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

SMC vs TRGP

Header iconSMC vs TRGP Comparison
Open Charts SMC vs TRGPBanner chart's image
Summit Midstream
Price$20.86
Change+$0.77 (+3.83%)
Volume$123.29K
Capitalization255.37M
Targa Resources
Price$163.19
Change-$2.32 (-1.40%)
Volume$1.53M
Capitalization35.12B
SMC vs TRGP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SMC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRGP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SMC vs. TRGP commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMC is a Hold and TRGP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (SMC: $20.86 vs. TRGP: $163.19)
Brand notoriety: SMC: Not notable vs. TRGP: Notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Pipelines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SMC: 105% vs. TRGP: 95%
Market capitalization -- SMC: $255.37M vs. TRGP: $35.12B
SMC [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] is valued at $255.37M. TRGP’s [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] market capitalization is $35.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry ranges from $103.07B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry is $11.67B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SMC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTRGP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • SMC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TRGP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both SMC and TRGP are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SMC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRGP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SMC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • TRGP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TRGP is a better buy in the short-term than SMC.

Price Growth

SMC (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а -14.65% price change this week, while TRGP (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was -1.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was -2.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.47%.

Reported Earning Dates

TRGP is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (-2.28% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRGP($35.1B) has a higher market cap than SMC($255M). TRGP has higher P/E ratio than SMC: TRGP (23.41) vs SMC (5.74). TRGP YTD gains are higher at: -7.169 vs. SMC (-44.786). TRGP has more cash in the bank: 140M vs. SMC (26.2M). SMC has less debt than TRGP: SMC (1.08B) vs TRGP (16.2B).
SMCTRGPSMC / TRGP
Capitalization255M35.1B1%
EBITDA108MN/A-
Gain YTD-44.786-7.169625%
P/E Ratio5.7423.4125%
Revenue443MN/A-
Total Cash26.2M140M19%
Total Debt1.08B16.2B7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SMC vs TRGP: Fundamental Ratings
SMC
TRGP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5614
SMR RATING
1..100
9720
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9159
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3179
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SMC's Valuation (29) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TRGP (73) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that SMC’s stock grew somewhat faster than TRGP’s over the last 12 months.

TRGP's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMC (56) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that TRGP’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMC’s over the last 12 months.

TRGP's SMR Rating (20) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is significantly better than the same rating for SMC (97) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that TRGP’s stock grew significantly faster than SMC’s over the last 12 months.

TRGP's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is in the same range as SMC (91) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that TRGP’s stock grew similarly to SMC’s over the last 12 months.

SMC's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TRGP (79) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that SMC’s stock grew somewhat faster than TRGP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SMCTRGP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SMC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRGP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BRGC0.240.01
+2.30%
BrightRock Gold Corp.
PGNT4.500.10
+2.27%
Paragon Technologies, Inc.
UOVEY56.750.21
+0.37%
United Overseas Bank Ltd.
ALGGY6.03N/A
N/A
Alliance Global Group, Inc.
HCXLF16.86N/A
N/A
Hiscox, Ltd.

SMC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMC has been loosely correlated with ET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMC jumps, then ET could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMC
1D Price
Change %
SMC100%
+3.83%
ET - SMC
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.81%
TRGP - SMC
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.40%
OKE - SMC
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.16%
PAGP - SMC
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.15%
VNOM - SMC
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.67%
More

TRGP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TRGP has been closely correlated with OKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TRGP jumps, then OKE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRGP
1D Price
Change %
TRGP100%
-1.40%
OKE - TRGP
86%
Closely correlated
-1.16%
KNTK - TRGP
78%
Closely correlated
-0.24%
ET - TRGP
73%
Closely correlated
-0.81%
WMB - TRGP
72%
Closely correlated
+0.21%
KMI - TRGP
72%
Closely correlated
-0.67%
More