Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SMAPX vs SMRPX
SMAPX vs SMRPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SMAPX vs. SMRPX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMAPX is a Hold and SMRPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMAPX (1.31B) and SMRPX (1.31B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . SMRPX pays higher dividends than SMAPX: SMRPX (4.22) vs SMAPX (3.88). SMAPX was incepted earlier than SMRPX: SMAPX (13 years) vs SMRPX (10 years). SMAPX (1.40) is less costly to investors than SMRPX (1.05). SMAPX (52.00) and SMRPX (52.00) have comparable annual turnover. SMAPX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMRPX: SMAPX (1000) vs SMRPX (1000000). SMRPX (7.66) and SMAPX (7.33) have marching annual gain over last year. SMRPX (135.35) and SMAPX (131.95) have equivalent 5 years return.
| SMAPX | SMRPX | SMAPX / SMRPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 1.02 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 1.05 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.269 | 8.317 | 99% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.31B | 1.31B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.88 | 4.22 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.33 | 7.66 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.16 | 70.88 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 131.95 | 135.35 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 204.67 | 213.70 | 96% |