SMAGF
Price
$0.94
Change
-$0.01 (-1.05%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
111.44M
TORXF
Price
$41.45
Change
-$0.15 (-0.36%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
3.59B
42 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

SMAGF vs TORXF

Header iconSMAGF vs TORXF Comparison
Open Charts SMAGF vs TORXFBanner chart's image
Soma Gold
Price$0.94
Change-$0.01 (-1.05%)
Volume$111.53K
Capitalization111.44M
Torex Gold Resources
Price$41.45
Change-$0.15 (-0.36%)
Volume$50.37K
Capitalization3.59B
SMAGF vs TORXF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SMAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TORXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SMAGF vs. TORXF commentary
Sep 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMAGF is a Buy and TORXF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 24, 2025
Stock price -- (SMAGF: $0.94 vs. TORXF: $41.45)
Brand notoriety: SMAGF and TORXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SMAGF: 138% vs. TORXF: 129%
Market capitalization -- SMAGF: $111.44M vs. TORXF: $3.59B
SMAGF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $111.44M. TORXF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $3.59B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $97.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SMAGF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTORXF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SMAGF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TORXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TORXF is a better buy in the long-term than SMAGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SMAGF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TORXF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SMAGF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TORXF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TORXF is a better buy in the short-term than SMAGF.

Price Growth

SMAGF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +5.17% price change this week, while TORXF (@Precious Metals) price change was +6.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +30.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6063.35%.

Reported Earning Dates

TORXF is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.38% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TORXF($3.59B) has a higher market cap than SMAGF($111M). TORXF has higher P/E ratio than SMAGF: TORXF (17.06) vs SMAGF (13.02). SMAGF YTD gains are higher at: 153.871 vs. TORXF (111.761). TORXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 484M vs. SMAGF (41.1M). TORXF has more cash in the bank: 103M vs. SMAGF (3.82M). SMAGF has less debt than TORXF: SMAGF (32.3M) vs TORXF (326M). TORXF has higher revenues than SMAGF: TORXF (1.03B) vs SMAGF (98.2M).
SMAGFTORXFSMAGF / TORXF
Capitalization111M3.59B3%
EBITDA41.1M484M8%
Gain YTD153.871111.761138%
P/E Ratio13.0217.0676%
Revenue98.2M1.03B10%
Total Cash3.82M103M4%
Total Debt32.3M326M10%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SMAGF vs TORXF: Fundamental Ratings
SMAGF
TORXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2085
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3118
SMR RATING
1..100
1861
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3837
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9137
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TORXF's Valuation (65) in the null industry is in the same range as SMAGF (69). This means that TORXF’s stock grew similarly to SMAGF’s over the last 12 months.

TORXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the null industry is in the same range as SMAGF (31). This means that TORXF’s stock grew similarly to SMAGF’s over the last 12 months.

SMAGF's SMR Rating (18) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TORXF (61). This means that SMAGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TORXF’s over the last 12 months.

TORXF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as SMAGF (38). This means that TORXF’s stock grew similarly to SMAGF’s over the last 12 months.

TORXF's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMAGF (91). This means that TORXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMAGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SMAGFTORXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SMAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TORXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
USVM90.490.05
+0.05%
VictoryShares US Sm Md Cp Val Momt ETF
CPNS26.950.01
+0.04%
Calamos Nasdaq-100 Str Alt Prt ETF-Sep
LIAJ191.83N/A
N/A
LifeX 2053 Infl-Prt Longevity Inc ETF
FDFF37.14-0.40
-1.07%
Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF
CHIQ23.38-0.39
-1.64%
Global X MSCI China Consumer Disc ETF

SMAGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMAGF has been loosely correlated with TORXF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMAGF jumps, then TORXF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMAGF
1D Price
Change %
SMAGF100%
-0.27%
TORXF - SMAGF
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.37%
STLRF - SMAGF
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.94%
PROBF - SMAGF
28%
Poorly correlated
-4.04%
LOMLF - SMAGF
28%
Poorly correlated
-4.27%
SNWGF - SMAGF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.42%
More

TORXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TORXF has been loosely correlated with KNTNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TORXF jumps, then KNTNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TORXF
1D Price
Change %
TORXF100%
-0.37%
KNTNF - TORXF
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.73%
WDOFF - TORXF
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.70%
LGDTF - TORXF
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.72%
JAGGF - TORXF
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.70%
SNWGF - TORXF
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.42%
More