SMAGF
Price
$0.86
Change
-$0.04 (-4.44%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
39.28M
STLRF
Price
$0.60
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

SMAGF vs STLRF

Header iconSMAGF vs STLRF Comparison
Open Charts SMAGF vs STLRFBanner chart's image
Soma Gold
Price$0.86
Change-$0.04 (-4.44%)
Volume$13.5K
Capitalization39.28M
STLLR GOLD
Price$0.60
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$10K
CapitalizationN/A
SMAGF vs STLRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SMAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STLRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SMAGF vs. STLRF commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMAGF is a Hold and STLRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (SMAGF: $0.86 vs. STLRF: $0.60)
Brand notoriety: SMAGF and STLRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SMAGF: 31% vs. STLRF: 30%
Market capitalization -- SMAGF: $39.28M vs. STLRF: $0
SMAGF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $39.28M. STLRF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SMAGF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSTLRF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SMAGF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • STLRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SMAGF is a better buy in the long-term than STLRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SMAGF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STLRF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SMAGF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • STLRF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, STLRF is a better buy in the short-term than SMAGF.

Price Growth

SMAGF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -5.95% price change this week, while STLRF (@Precious Metals) price change was +3.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMAGF YTD gains are higher at: 131.761 vs. STLRF (4.099).
SMAGFSTLRFSMAGF / STLRF
Capitalization39.3MN/A-
EBITDA16.8MN/A-
Gain YTD131.7614.0993,215%
P/E Ratio625.00N/A-
Revenue50.3MN/A-
Total Cash680KN/A-
Total Debt29.6MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SMAGF vs STLRF: Fundamental Ratings
SMAGF
STLRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8163
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
14100
SMR RATING
1..100
2394
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3559
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
92100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

STLRF's Valuation (31) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMAGF (68). This means that STLRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMAGF’s over the last 12 months.

SMAGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for STLRF (100). This means that SMAGF’s stock grew significantly faster than STLRF’s over the last 12 months.

SMAGF's SMR Rating (23) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for STLRF (94). This means that SMAGF’s stock grew significantly faster than STLRF’s over the last 12 months.

SMAGF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as STLRF (59). This means that SMAGF’s stock grew similarly to STLRF’s over the last 12 months.

SMAGF's P/E Growth Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as STLRF (100). This means that SMAGF’s stock grew similarly to STLRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SMAGFSTLRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SMAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STLRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QTEYF0.220.01
+5.79%
Questerre Energy Corp.
ASHTF64.502.50
+4.03%
Ashtead Group PLC
VLEEY5.630.20
+3.68%
Valeo SE
SBOEY3.34N/A
N/A
Schoeller Bleckmann Oilfield Equipment AG
LINSA11.00N/A
N/A
Life Insurance Co. Of Alabama

SMAGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMAGF has been loosely correlated with TORXF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMAGF jumps, then TORXF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMAGF
1D Price
Change %
SMAGF100%
-4.21%
TORXF - SMAGF
35%
Loosely correlated
-3.97%
STLRF - SMAGF
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.31%
PROBF - SMAGF
28%
Poorly correlated
-5.95%
LOMLF - SMAGF
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.15%
IMPUY - SMAGF
27%
Poorly correlated
-5.47%
More

STLRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STLRF has been loosely correlated with NSUPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if STLRF jumps, then NSUPF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STLRF
1D Price
Change %
STLRF100%
-0.31%
NSUPF - STLRF
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.15%
TORXF - STLRF
36%
Loosely correlated
-3.97%
CGLCF - STLRF
35%
Loosely correlated
-3.33%
SMAGF - STLRF
35%
Loosely correlated
-4.21%
AYASF - STLRF
35%
Loosely correlated
-5.62%
More