Advertisement
SLYV vs WSFS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SLYV is a StrongBuy and WSFS is a StrongBuy.
WSFS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 24 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 54 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 49 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 14 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| SLYV | WSFS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 61% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 81% | 16 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 49% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FTWO | 45.17 | 1.11 | +2.52% |
| Strive Natural Resources and SecurityETF | |||
| HWAY | 34.33 | 0.64 | +1.90% |
| Themes US Infrastructure ETF | |||
| UJAN | 43.54 | -0.14 | -0.32% |
| Innovator US Equity Ultra Buff ETF™ Jan | |||
| GAM | 60.69 | -0.29 | -0.48% |
| General American Investors Company | |||
| DADS | 19.58 | -0.12 | -0.63% |
| Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF | |||
SLYV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLYV has been closely correlated with SBCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SLYV jumps, then SBCF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SLYV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLYV | 100% | +0.12% | ||
| SBCF - SLYV | 84% Closely correlated | +2.31% | ||
| WSFS - SLYV | 84% Closely correlated | +1.99% | ||
| UCB - SLYV | 83% Closely correlated | +1.09% | ||
| SFBS - SLYV | 83% Closely correlated | +0.02% | ||
| AUB - SLYV | 83% Closely correlated | +2.40% | ||
More | ||||
WSFS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WSFS has been closely correlated with EFSC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WSFS jumps, then EFSC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WSFS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WSFS | 100% | +1.99% | ||
| EFSC - WSFS | 91% Closely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| UCB - WSFS | 91% Closely correlated | +1.09% | ||
| STBA - WSFS | 91% Closely correlated | +0.65% | ||
| UBSI - WSFS | 89% Closely correlated | +2.11% | ||
| HOMB - WSFS | 89% Closely correlated | +0.89% | ||
More | ||||