Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SLYG vs TMFS
SLYG vs TMFS Comparison
Open Charts SLYG vs TMFS
State Street® SPDR® S&P 600™ Sm Cp GrETF
Price$95.88
Change+$1.44 (+1.52%)
Volume$95.18K
Net Assets3.65B
Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF
Price$35.32
Change+$0.86 (+2.50%)
Volume$7.46K
Net Assets73.33M
SLYG vs TMFS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SLYG vs. TMFS commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SLYG is a Hold and TMFS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLYG has more net assets: 3.65B vs. TMFS (73.3M). SLYG has a higher annual dividend yield than TMFS: SLYG (5.328) vs TMFS (-2.188). SLYG was incepted earlier than TMFS: SLYG (25 years) vs TMFS (7 years). SLYG (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than TMFS (0.85). SLYG has a higher turnover TMFS (30.00) vs TMFS (30.00).
| SLYG | TMFS | SLYG / TMFS | |
| Gain YTD | 5.328 | -2.188 | -243% |
| Net Assets | 3.65B | 73.3M | 4,977% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.85 | 18% |
| Turnover | 50.00 | 30.00 | 167% |
| Yield | 1.10 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SLYG | TMFS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | 7 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 85% | 7 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 85% | 7 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 81% | 7 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 84% | 7 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 83% | 7 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 84% | 7 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 83% | 15 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | 7 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 85% | 7 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
SLYG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLYG has been closely correlated with PIPR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SLYG jumps, then PIPR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SLYG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLYG | 100% | -0.23% | ||
| PIPR - SLYG | 85% Closely correlated | -1.66% | ||
| MC - SLYG | 84% Closely correlated | -0.50% | ||
| NPO - SLYG | 81% Closely correlated | +0.93% | ||
| APAM - SLYG | 81% Closely correlated | +0.81% | ||
| AX - SLYG | 80% Closely correlated | -1.23% | ||
More | ||||
TMFS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMFS has been closely correlated with ALRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TMFS jumps, then ALRM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TMFS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMFS | 100% | +0.44% | ||
| ALRM - TMFS | 71% Closely correlated | +0.23% | ||
| TREX - TMFS | 71% Closely correlated | -1.47% | ||
| QTWO - TMFS | 71% Closely correlated | -1.65% | ||
| IPGP - TMFS | 71% Closely correlated | +2.53% | ||
| HXL - TMFS | 71% Closely correlated | +0.60% | ||
More | ||||