SLVTF
Price
$0.33
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
57.79M
SRCRF
Price
$0.15
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
7.16M
Interact to see
Advertisement

SLVTF vs SRCRF

Header iconSLVTF vs SRCRF Comparison
Open Charts SLVTF vs SRCRFBanner chart's image
Silver Tiger Metals
Price$0.33
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$358.11K
Capitalization57.79M
Scorpio Gold
Price$0.15
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$115.12K
Capitalization7.16M
SLVTF vs SRCRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SLVTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SRCRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SLVTF vs. SRCRF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SLVTF is a StrongBuy and SRCRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (SLVTF: $0.33 vs. SRCRF: $0.15)
Brand notoriety: SLVTF and SRCRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SLVTF: 105% vs. SRCRF: 114%
Market capitalization -- SLVTF: $57.79M vs. SRCRF: $7.16M
SLVTF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $57.79M. SRCRF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $7.16M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SLVTF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSRCRF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SLVTF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SRCRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both SLVTF and SRCRF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SLVTF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SRCRF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SLVTF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SRCRF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SLVTF is a better buy in the short-term than SRCRF.

Price Growth

SLVTF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +0.03% price change this week, while SRCRF (@Precious Metals) price change was +6.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLVTF($57.8M) has a higher market cap than SRCRF($7.16M). SRCRF (113.490) and SLVTF (110.390) have similar YTD gains . SRCRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.74M vs. SLVTF (-4.4M). SLVTF has more cash in the bank: 18.4M vs. SRCRF (57.8K). SLVTF has less debt than SRCRF: SLVTF (33.5K) vs SRCRF (3.16M). SLVTF (0) and SRCRF (0) have equivalent revenues.
SLVTFSRCRFSLVTF / SRCRF
Capitalization57.8M7.16M807%
EBITDA-4.4M-1.74M254%
Gain YTD110.390113.49097%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash18.4M57.8K31,834%
Total Debt33.5K3.16M1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SLVTF vs SRCRF: Fundamental Ratings
SLVTF
SRCRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8182
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
41
Fair valued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
67100
SMR RATING
1..100
91100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3535
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1008
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SLVTF's Valuation (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SRCRF (82). This means that SLVTF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SRCRF’s over the last 12 months.

SLVTF's Profit vs Risk Rating (67) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SRCRF (100). This means that SLVTF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SRCRF’s over the last 12 months.

SLVTF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as SRCRF (100). This means that SLVTF’s stock grew similarly to SRCRF’s over the last 12 months.

SLVTF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as SRCRF (35). This means that SLVTF’s stock grew similarly to SRCRF’s over the last 12 months.

SRCRF's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SLVTF (100). This means that SRCRF’s stock grew significantly faster than SLVTF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SLVTFSRCRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
85%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SLVTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SRCRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RGLXY4.300.30
+7.50%
RTL Group SA
XTMIF0.04N/A
+3.66%
XTM Inc.
KLRGF19.83N/A
N/A
Keller Group Plc
SMMNY27.36-0.04
-0.16%
Siemens Healthineers AG
JUSHF0.29-0.01
-3.24%
Jushi Holdings Inc.

SLVTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLVTF has been loosely correlated with ISVLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SLVTF jumps, then ISVLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLVTF
1D Price
Change %
SLVTF100%
+0.57%
ISVLF - SLVTF
41%
Loosely correlated
-4.54%
AYASF - SLVTF
41%
Loosely correlated
-5.62%
MAIFF - SLVTF
40%
Loosely correlated
+4.14%
GSVRF - SLVTF
39%
Loosely correlated
-5.68%
BCEKF - SLVTF
39%
Loosely correlated
-1.40%
More

SRCRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SRCRF and GGLXF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SRCRF and GGLXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SRCRF
1D Price
Change %
SRCRF100%
-0.76%
GGLXF - SRCRF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MAKAF - SRCRF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SLVTF - SRCRF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.57%
SMOFF - SRCRF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-2.49%
SLVRF - SRCRF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-2.65%
More