SLVRF
Price
$0.17
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
ZCTSF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
Ad is loading...

SLVRF vs ZCTSF

Header iconSLVRF vs ZCTSF Comparison
Open Charts SLVRF vs ZCTSFBanner chart's image
Silver One Resources
Price$0.17
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$185.53K
CapitalizationN/A
Zacatecas Silver
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$166.43K
CapitalizationN/A
SLVRF vs ZCTSF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SLVRF vs. ZCTSF commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SLVRF is a Sell and ZCTSF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (SLVRF: $0.17 vs. ZCTSF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: SLVRF and ZCTSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SLVRF: 69% vs. ZCTSF: 201%
Market capitalization -- SLVRF: $66.6M vs. ZCTSF: $20.46M
SLVRF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $66.6M. ZCTSF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $20.46M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SLVRF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileZCTSF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SLVRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ZCTSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SLVRF is a better buy in the long-term than ZCTSF.

Price Growth

SLVRF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -19.13% price change this week, while ZCTSF (@Precious Metals) price change was -30.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.52%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.47% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLVRF($66.6M) has a higher market cap than ZCTSF($20.5M). SLVRF YTD gains are higher at: 22.953 vs. ZCTSF (-50.353). SLVRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -3.31M vs. ZCTSF (-12M). SLVRF has more cash in the bank: 2.73M vs. ZCTSF (71K). SLVRF (0) and ZCTSF (0) have equivalent revenues.
SLVRFZCTSFSLVRF / ZCTSF
Capitalization66.6M20.5M325%
EBITDA-3.31M-12M28%
Gain YTD22.953-50.353-46%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash2.73M71K3,841%
Total Debt0N/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SLVRF: Fundamental Ratings
SLVRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
52
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
93
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
64
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

SLVRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLVRF has been loosely correlated with ISVLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SLVRF jumps, then ISVLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLVRF
1D Price
Change %
SLVRF100%
-0.06%
ISVLF - SLVRF
52%
Loosely correlated
+6.89%
KNTNF - SLVRF
50%
Loosely correlated
+2.20%
BCEKF - SLVRF
47%
Loosely correlated
+4.57%
TORXF - SLVRF
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.70%
AYASF - SLVRF
43%
Loosely correlated
-21.50%
More

ZCTSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZCTSF has been loosely correlated with VITFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ZCTSF jumps, then VITFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZCTSF
1D Price
Change %
ZCTSF100%
-5.17%
VITFF - ZCTSF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SSVRF - ZCTSF
30%
Poorly correlated
+4.09%
GSVRF - ZCTSF
30%
Poorly correlated
-5.27%
MRZLF - ZCTSF
26%
Poorly correlated
-5.15%
SLVRF - ZCTSF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.06%
More