SLVM
Price
$46.55
Change
-$0.28 (-0.60%)
Updated
Nov 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.85B
85 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WBNEF
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
5.46M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SLVM vs WBNEF

Header iconSLVM vs WBNEF Comparison
Open Charts SLVM vs WBNEFBanner chart's image
Sylvamo
Price$46.55
Change-$0.28 (-0.60%)
Volume$4.15K
Capitalization1.85B
Westbond Enterprises
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.5K
Capitalization5.46M
SLVM vs WBNEF Comparison Chart in %
SLVM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SLVM vs. WBNEF commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SLVM is a Hold and WBNEF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (SLVM: $46.83 vs. WBNEF: $0.15)
Brand notoriety: SLVM and WBNEF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pulp & Paper industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SLVM: 255% vs. WBNEF: 100%
Market capitalization -- SLVM: $1.85B vs. WBNEF: $5.46M
SLVM [@Pulp & Paper] is valued at $1.85B. WBNEF’s [@Pulp & Paper] market capitalization is $5.46M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pulp & Paper] industry ranges from $14.83B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pulp & Paper] industry is $4.51B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SLVM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWBNEF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SLVM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WBNEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SLVM is a better buy in the long-term than WBNEF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SLVM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SLVM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

SLVM (@Pulp & Paper) experienced а +15.23% price change this week, while WBNEF (@Pulp & Paper) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pulp & Paper industry was +0.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

SLVM is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pulp & Paper (+0.67% weekly)

The pulp and paper industry includes companies that make pulp and process pulp into paper and specialty paper products. Companies in this industry also operate paper mills. The industry’s products have wide array of markets including books, magazines, envelopes, containerboard, and food and beverage packaging. Domtar Corporation, Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. and Neenah Inc. are some of the major pulp & paper companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLVM($1.85B) has a higher market cap than WBNEF($5.46M). WBNEF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. SLVM (-38.790). SLVM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 503M vs. WBNEF (1.18M). WBNEF has less debt than SLVM: WBNEF (1.88M) vs SLVM (813M). SLVM has higher revenues than WBNEF: SLVM (3.55B) vs WBNEF (9.05M).
SLVMWBNEFSLVM / WBNEF
Capitalization1.85B5.46M33,803%
EBITDA503M1.18M42,519%
Gain YTD-38.7900.000-
P/E Ratio10.79N/A-
Revenue3.55B9.05M39,244%
Total CashN/A51.9K-
Total Debt813M1.88M43,222%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SLVMWBNEF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
13%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
10%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
72%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SLVM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MDIIX19.630.11
+0.56%
iShares MSCI EAFE Intl Idx Inv A
PJGZX24.990.14
+0.56%
PGIM Jennison Focused Value Z
GTTRX34.29-0.05
-0.15%
Goldman Sachs Small Cp Val Insghts R
CISGX21.25-0.12
-0.56%
Touchstone Sands Capital Select Gr Instl
PRKZX7.53-0.08
-1.05%
PGIM Real Estate Income Z

SLVM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLVM has been loosely correlated with CLW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SLVM jumps, then CLW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLVM
1D Price
Change %
SLVM100%
-0.21%
CLW - SLVM
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.98%
MAGN - SLVM
32%
Poorly correlated
+6.07%
MERC - SLVM
30%
Poorly correlated
+2.42%
MATV - SLVM
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.53%
SEOAY - SLVM
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.14%
More

WBNEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WBNEF and SEOJF have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WBNEF and SEOJF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WBNEF
1D Price
Change %
WBNEF100%
N/A
SEOJF - WBNEF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SLVM - WBNEF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.21%
HLMMF - WBNEF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNODF - WBNEF
0%
Poorly correlated
-0.04%
NIJPF - WBNEF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More