SLVM
Price
$50.75
Change
+$2.89 (+6.04%)
Updated
Feb 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.89B
8 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WBNEF
Price
$0.15
Change
+$0.07 (+87.50%)
Updated
Nov 20 closing price
Capitalization
5.86M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SLVM vs WBNEF

Header iconSLVM vs WBNEF Comparison
Open Charts SLVM vs WBNEFBanner chart's image
Sylvamo
Price$50.75
Change+$2.89 (+6.04%)
Volume$4.65K
Capitalization1.89B
Westbond Enterprises
Price$0.15
Change+$0.07 (+87.50%)
Volume$2.5K
Capitalization5.86M
SLVM vs WBNEF Comparison Chart in %
SLVM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SLVM vs. WBNEF commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SLVM is a StrongBuy and WBNEF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (SLVM: $47.86 vs. WBNEF: $0.15)
Brand notoriety: SLVM and WBNEF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pulp & Paper industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SLVM: 121% vs. WBNEF: 41%
Market capitalization -- SLVM: $1.89B vs. WBNEF: $5.86M
SLVM [@Pulp & Paper] is valued at $1.89B. WBNEF’s [@Pulp & Paper] market capitalization is $5.86M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pulp & Paper] industry ranges from $14.77B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pulp & Paper] industry is $4.68B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SLVM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWBNEF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SLVM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WBNEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SLVM is a better buy in the long-term than WBNEF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SLVM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SLVM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

SLVM (@Pulp & Paper) experienced а -5.08% price change this week, while WBNEF (@Pulp & Paper) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pulp & Paper industry was -0.90%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.46%.

Reported Earning Dates

SLVM is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pulp & Paper (-0.90% weekly)

The pulp and paper industry includes companies that make pulp and process pulp into paper and specialty paper products. Companies in this industry also operate paper mills. The industry’s products have wide array of markets including books, magazines, envelopes, containerboard, and food and beverage packaging. Domtar Corporation, Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. and Neenah Inc. are some of the major pulp & paper companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLVM($1.89B) has a higher market cap than WBNEF($5.86M). WBNEF has higher P/E ratio than SLVM: WBNEF (41.58) vs SLVM (11.03). SLVM YTD gains are higher at: 0.343 vs. WBNEF (0.000). SLVM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 473M vs. WBNEF (1.78M). WBNEF has less debt than SLVM: WBNEF (1.36M) vs SLVM (808M). SLVM has higher revenues than WBNEF: SLVM (3.43B) vs WBNEF (10.6M).
SLVMWBNEFSLVM / WBNEF
Capitalization1.89B5.86M32,213%
EBITDA473M1.78M26,573%
Gain YTD0.3430.000-
P/E Ratio11.0341.5827%
Revenue3.43B10.6M32,368%
Total CashN/A277K-
Total Debt808M1.36M59,281%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SLVMWBNEF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
11%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
6%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
73%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
73%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SLVM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DC6.370.48
+8.15%
Dakota Gold Corp
CBU64.400.64
+1.00%
Community Financial System Inc
MKL2038.654.66
+0.23%
Markel Group
SBFG22.23-0.29
-1.29%
SB Financial Group
SCKT1.12-0.06
-5.46%
Socket Mobile

SLVM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLVM has been loosely correlated with CLW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SLVM jumps, then CLW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLVM
1D Price
Change %
SLVM100%
-1.34%
CLW - SLVM
40%
Loosely correlated
-3.97%
MAGN - SLVM
33%
Loosely correlated
+0.97%
MERC - SLVM
26%
Poorly correlated
-5.67%
MATV - SLVM
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.87%
SEOAY - SLVM
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.13%
More

WBNEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WBNEF and SEOJF have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WBNEF and SEOJF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WBNEF
1D Price
Change %
WBNEF100%
N/A
SEOJF - WBNEF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SLVM - WBNEF
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.34%
HLMMF - WBNEF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNODF - WBNEF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NIJPF - WBNEF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More