Advertisement
SLOIF vs TOELF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SLOIF is a Hold and TOELF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SLOIF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTOELF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- SLOIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- TOELF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SLOIF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TOELF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- SLOIF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
- TOELF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
SLOIF (@Electronic Production Equipment) experienced а -11.07% price change this week, while TOELF (@Electronic Production Equipment) price change was -5.63% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was +0.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.00%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronic Production Equipment (+0.31% weekly)The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.
| SLOIF | TOELF | SLOIF / TOELF | |
| Capitalization | 1.34B | 62.7B | 2% |
| EBITDA | 278M | 653B | 0% |
| Gain YTD | -58.511 | -6.959 | 841% |
| P/E Ratio | 12.67 | 16.82 | 75% |
| Revenue | 891M | 2.13T | 0% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 526B | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | N/A | - |
SLOIF | TOELF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 93 | 25 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 54 Fair valued | 9 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 78 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 86 | 9 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 91 | 81 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 92 | 86 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TOELF's Valuation (9) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SLOIF (54). This means that TOELF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SLOIF’s over the last 12 months.
TOELF's Profit vs Risk Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as SLOIF (100). This means that TOELF’s stock grew similarly to SLOIF’s over the last 12 months.
TOELF's SMR Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SLOIF (86). This means that TOELF’s stock grew significantly faster than SLOIF’s over the last 12 months.
TOELF's Price Growth Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as SLOIF (91). This means that TOELF’s stock grew similarly to SLOIF’s over the last 12 months.
TOELF's P/E Growth Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as SLOIF (92). This means that TOELF’s stock grew similarly to SLOIF’s over the last 12 months.
| SLOIF | TOELF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 52% | 1 day ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 11 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 36% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 48% | 1 day ago 66% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SGTTX | 89.21 | N/A | N/A |
| Columbia Seligman Global Tech Inst2 | |||
| GGCPX | 15.62 | N/A | N/A |
| Goldman Sachs International T/M Eq P | |||
| RDVIX | 6.35 | N/A | N/A |
| Royce Smid-Cap Total Return Investment | |||
| PAULX | 45.04 | N/A | N/A |
| T. Rowe Price US Large-Cap Core Adv | |||
| UUOAX | 21.63 | N/A | N/A |
| GMO U.S. Opportunistic Value Vi | |||
SLOIF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SLOIF and TOELF have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SLOIF and TOELF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SLOIF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLOIF | 100% | N/A | ||
| TOELF - SLOIF | 8% Poorly correlated | -2.33% | ||
| SCIA - SLOIF | 8% Poorly correlated | +3.36% | ||
| ROHCF - SLOIF | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ROHCY - SLOIF | 6% Poorly correlated | -2.41% | ||
| TOELY - SLOIF | 5% Poorly correlated | +0.18% | ||
More | ||||
TOELF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TOELF has been closely correlated with TOELY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TOELF jumps, then TOELY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TOELF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOELF | 100% | -2.33% | ||
| TOELY - TOELF | 74% Closely correlated | +0.18% | ||
| DSCSY - TOELF | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.39% | ||
| LSRCY - TOELF | 46% Loosely correlated | +3.89% | ||
| ATEYY - TOELF | 44% Loosely correlated | +1.69% | ||
| RNECY - TOELF | 43% Loosely correlated | -1.59% | ||
More | ||||