SLNH
Price
$2.75
Change
-$0.19 (-6.46%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
89.71M
SLNHP
Price
$7.25
Change
-$0.24 (-3.20%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

SLNH vs SLNHP

Header iconSLNH vs SLNHP Comparison
Open Charts SLNH vs SLNHPBanner chart's image
Soluna Holdings
Price$2.75
Change-$0.19 (-6.46%)
Volume$17.27M
Capitalization89.71M
Soluna Holdings
Price$7.25
Change-$0.24 (-3.20%)
Volume$12.49K
CapitalizationN/A
SLNH vs SLNHP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SLNH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLNHP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SLNH vs. SLNHP commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SLNH is a Buy and SLNHP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (SLNH: $2.75 vs. SLNHP: $7.25)
Brand notoriety: SLNH and SLNHP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SLNH: 152% vs. SLNHP: 58%
Market capitalization -- SLNH: $89.71M vs. SLNHP: $0
SLNH [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $89.71M. SLNHP’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SLNH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSLNHP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SLNH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SLNHP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both SLNH and SLNHP are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SLNH’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLNHP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SLNH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SLNHP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SLNH is a better buy in the short-term than SLNHP.

Price Growth

SLNH (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +154.63% price change this week, while SLNHP (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +12.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +64.54%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-0.96% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLNH YTD gains are higher at: 30.952 vs. SLNHP (-19.444). SLNH (-44.67M) and SLNHP (-44.67M) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . SLNH (9.88M) and SLNHP (9.88M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . SLNH (23.6M) and SLNHP (23.6M) have identical debt. SLNH (27.9M) and SLNHP (27.9M) have equivalent revenues.
SLNHSLNHPSLNH / SLNHP
Capitalization89.7MN/A-
EBITDA-44.67M-44.67M100%
Gain YTD30.952-19.444-159%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue27.9M27.9M100%
Total Cash9.88M9.88M100%
Total Debt23.6M23.6M100%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SLNH: Fundamental Ratings
SLNH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
30
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
34
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SLNHSLNHP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SLNH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLNHP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RECT3.590.11
+3.16%
Rectitude Holdings Ltd
CGNX45.790.92
+2.05%
Cognex Corp
SRCE62.810.46
+0.74%
1st Source Corp
GFR4.870.03
+0.62%
Greenfire Resources Ltd
ONBPP25.220.03
+0.10%
Old National Bancorp

SLNH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLNH has been loosely correlated with BITF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SLNH jumps, then BITF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLNH
1D Price
Change %
SLNH100%
-6.46%
BITF - SLNH
49%
Loosely correlated
-5.22%
HUT - SLNH
43%
Loosely correlated
-4.93%
HIVE - SLNH
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.68%
COIN - SLNH
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.92%
CIFR - SLNH
39%
Loosely correlated
-1.63%
More

SLNHP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SLNHP and SLNH have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SLNHP and SLNH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLNHP
1D Price
Change %
SLNHP100%
-3.20%
SLNH - SLNHP
21%
Poorly correlated
-6.46%
BITF - SLNHP
12%
Poorly correlated
-5.22%
GREE - SLNHP
12%
Poorly correlated
-1.17%
LGHL - SLNHP
10%
Poorly correlated
+3.20%
HUT - SLNHP
8%
Poorly correlated
-4.93%
More